Visualizzazione post con etichetta UN. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta UN. Mostra tutti i post

giovedì 30 novembre 2023

COP28 : AN OVERVIEW OF UN CLIMATE CHANGE SUMMIT


Ahead of the COP28 in Dubai, running from 30 November to 12 December, we offer a general overview of the United Nations climate change conferences and their outcomes.



À Dubaï, coup d’envoi de la COP des ambitions

UNO/COP28: Kinderrecht auf einen nachhaltigen Planeten garantieren

By Vatican News

COP (Conference of the Parties) is the supreme decision-making body of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which was adopted in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), known as the “Earth Summit”, held in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) shortly after the first assessment report issued in 1990 by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The panel includes the world’s leading climate scientists, who in the past decades have provided policymakers with regular, comprehensive, and authoritative scientific assessments on climate science knowledge, and specifically on the link between climate change and human activities, building on the work of thousands of scientists worldwide.

Based on the first IPCC Report, the 1992 UN Convention established an international environmental treaty to combat "dangerous human interference with the climate system", in part by stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, though it did not bind signatories to reduce emissions and gave no targets or timetables for doing so. However, it required frequent meetings between the ratifying countries, known as the above-mentioned Conferences of the Parties.

The Convention was originally signed by 154 states. As of 2023, it has been ratified by 198 countries.

Since entering into force in 1994, the UNFCCC has provided the basis for international climate negotiations. Since 1995, when the first COP was held in Berlin (Germany), Parties have met every year to measure progress and negotiate multilateral responses to climate change.

Two landmark agreements

Negotiations have resulted in two landmark agreements: the Kyoto Protocol (1997) requiring developed countries to reduce emissions, and the Paris Agreement (2015), in which, after 25 years of difficult negotiations, 196 parties pledged to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, with enhanced support to assist developing countries to do so.

Its central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Although the U.S. originally signed the agreement, the Trump Administration pulled out in 2017. U.S President Joe Biden re-entered the United States in the Agreement in 2021, soon after his election.  However, since the adoption of the Paris Agreement progress in its implementation, namely in reducing emissions, has been slow.

Another major breakthrough came from COP -27 in  Sharm el-Sheikh in 2022 which established the Loss and Damage Fund, aimed to provide financial assistance to poorer nations as they deal with the negative consequences that arise from the unavoidable risks of climate change (rising sea levels, extreme heat waves, desertification, forest fires, crop failures etc.).

The funding will help vulnerable nations to rebuild the necessary physical and social infrastructure. While the fund is undoubtedly a historic breakthrough, its success largely depends on how quickly nations are able to get the fund up and running.

The COP-28 to be held in Dubai , United Arab Emirates,  from November 30 to December 12, 2023, will carry out the first global assessment of the Paris Agreement. The question of fossil fuels will once again be at the heart of discussions.

Timeline*

1992-1994 – The ground-breaking Rio Earth Summit and the UNFCCC

The summit results in some of the first international agreements on climate change, which become the foundation for future accords. Among them is the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) which aims to prevent “dangerous” human interference in the climate system, acknowledges that human activities contribute to climate change, and recognizes climate change as an issue of global concern. The UNFCCC, which went into force in 1994, does not legally bind signatories to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and gives no targets or timetables for doing so. But it requires frequent meetings between the ratifying countries, known as the Conference of the Parties, or COP. As of 2023 it has been ratified by 198 countries.

1995 - First meeting of UNFCCC signatories in Berlin (COP1)

UNFCCC signatories gather for the first Conference of the Parties, or COP1, in Berlin. The United States pushes back against legally binding targets and timetables, but it joins other parties in agreeing to negotiations to strengthen commitments on limiting greenhouse gases. The concluding document, known as the Berlin Mandate lays the groundwork for what will be the Kyoto Protocol, but it is criticized by environmental activists as a political solution that does not prompt immediate action.

1997 Kyoto Protocol, first legally binding climate treaty adopted at COP23

At COP3 in Japan, the conference adopts the Kyoto Protocol The legally binding treaty requires developed countries to reduce emissions by an average of 5 percent below 1990 levels and establishes a system to monitor countries’ progress. But the protocol does not compel developing countries, including high carbon emitters China and India, to take action. It also creates a carbon market for countries to trade emissions units and encourage sustainable development, a system known as “cap and trade.” Countries must now work out the details of implementing and ratifying the protocol.

2001 - Breakthrough in Bonn, but without the U.S.

The Kyoto Protocol is in jeopardy after talks collapse in November 2000 and the United States withdraws in March 2001, with Washington (pressurized by petroleum lobbies) saying that the protocol is not in the country’s “economic best interest.” In July 2001, negotiators in Bonn, Germany, reach breakthroughs on green technology, agreements on emissions trading, and compromises on how to account for carbon sinks (natural reservoirs that take in more carbon than they release). In October, countries agree on the rules for meeting targets set by the Kyoto Protocol, paving the way for its entry into force.

2005 -  The Kyoto Protocol takes effect

The Kyoto Protocol enters into force in February after it is ratified by enough countries to account for at least 55 percent of global emissions. Notably, it does not include the United States, the world’s leading carbon emitter. Between 2008 and 2012, when the protocol is set to expire, countries are supposed to reduce emissions by their pledged amounts: the European Union commits to reduce emissions by 8 percent below 1990 levels, Japan commits to 5 percent, and Russia commits to keeping levels steady with 1990 levels.

2007 - Negotiations begin for Kyoto 2.0

Before COP13 in Bali, Indonesia, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) releases a new strongly-worded report yet confirming that global warming is “most likely” caused by human activity. During the conference, discussions begin on a stronger successor to the Kyoto Protocol. But they come to a standstill after the United States objects to a widely backed proposal that calls for all industrialized nations to cut greenhouse gas emissions by specific targets. U.S. officials argue that developing countries must also make commitments. Washington eventually backs down, and the parties adopt the Bali Action Plan, which establishes the goal of drafting a new climate agreement by 2009.

September 2009 -  U.S. joins bold statements at UN

Three months ahead of the target date for a new agreement, several world leaders pledge actions during a UN summit on climate change hosted by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. Chinese President Hu Jintao announces a plan to cut emissions by a “notable margin” by 2020, marking the first time Beijing commits to reducing its rate of greenhouse gas emissions. Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama pledges to reduce emissions by 25 percent. U.S. newly elected President Barack Obama, in his first UN address, says the United States is determined to act and lead, but he doesn’t offer any new proposals. Ban expresses hope that leaders will reach a “substantive deal” during the upcoming conference in Copenhagen.

December 2009 - Disappointment at COP15 in Copenhagen (Denmark)

The successor to the Kyoto Protocol is supposed to be finalized at COP15 in Copenhagen, but the parties only come up with a nonbinding document that is “taken note of,” not adopted. The Copenhagen Accord acknowledges that global temperatures should not increase by 2°C (3.6°F) above preindustrial levels, though representatives from developing countries sought a target of 1.5°C (2.7°F). (A 2009 report from the American Meteorological Society predicts a 3.5°C [6.3°F] to 7.4°C [13.3°F] increase in less than one hundred years). After leading the negotiations, U.S. President Barack Obama tells the conference that the accord is “not enough.” Some countries later vow to follow the accord—though it remains non-binding—and make their own pledges.

2010  Temperature target set at COP16 in Cancun (Mexico)

There is increased pressure to reach a consensus in Mexico during COP16 after the failure in Copenhagen and NASA’s announcement that 2000–2009 was the warmest decade ever recorded. Countries commit for the first time to keep global temperature increases below 2°C in the Cancun Agreements. Approximately eighty countries, including China, India, and the United States, as well as the European Union, submit emissions reduction targets and actions, and they agree on stronger mechanisms for monitoring progress. But analysts say it’s not enough to stay below the 2°C target. The Green Climate Fund, a $100 billion fund to assist developing countries in mitigating and adapting to climate change, is also established. As of 2019, only around $3 billion has been contributed.

2011- New accord at COP17 to apply to all countries

The conference in Durban, South Africa, nearly fails after the world’s three biggest polluters—China, India, and the United States—reject an accord proposed by the European Union. But they eventually agree to work toward drafting a new, legally binding agreement in 2015 at the latest. The new agreement will differ from the Kyoto Protocol in that it will apply to both developed and developing countries. With the Kyoto Protocol set to expire in a few months, the parties agree to extend it until 2017.

2012 - No deal at COP 18 in Doha

Negotiators in Doha for COP18 extend the Kyoto Protocol until 2020, but remaining participants account for just 15 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. By this time, Canada has withdrawn from the treaty, and Japan and Russia say they will not accept new commitments. (The United States never signed on.) Environmental groups criticize countries for not reaching an effective agreement as Typhoon Bopha slams the Philippines, which they say exemplifies a rise in extreme weather caused by climate change. One of the conference’s successes is the Doha Amendment, under which developed countries agree to assist developing countries mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change. The agreement also sets delegates on the path toward a new treaty.

2013  - G77’s lead negotiators walk out at COP19 in Warsaw (Poland)

During the first week of COP19 in Poland, a grouping of developing countries, known as the Group of Seventy-Seven (G77), and China propose a new funding mechanism to help vulnerable countries deal with “loss and damage” caused by climate change. Developed countries oppose the mechanism, so the G77’s lead negotiators walk out of the conference. Talks eventually resume, and governments agree to a mechanism that falls short of what developing countries wanted. Countries also agree on how to implement an initiative to end deforestation known as REDD+, but the conference is described by analysts as the “least consequential COP in several years”.

2015 - Landmark Paris Agreement reached

196  countries agree to what experts call the most significant global climate agreement in history, known as the Paris Agreement. Unlike past accords, it requires nearly all countries—both developed and developing—to set emissions reduction goals. However, countries can choose their own targets and there are no enforcement mechanisms to ensure they meet them. Under the agreement, countries are supposed to submit targets known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs). The mission of the Paris Agreement, which enters into force in November 2016, is to keep global temperature rise below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it below 1.5°C. But analysts urge more action to achieve this goal. In 2017, President Donald J. Trump withdraws the United States from the agreement, saying that it imposes “draconian financial and economic burdens” on the country.

2018 - Rules for Paris Agreement decided

Just ahead of COP24 in Katowice, Poland, a new IPCC report warns of devastating consequences—including stronger storms and dangerous heat waves—if the average global temperature rises 1.5°C above preindustrial levels and projects that it could reach that level by 2030. Despite the report, countries do not agree to stronger targets. They do, however, largely settle on the rules for implementing the Paris accord, covering questions including how countries should report their emissions. They do not agree on rules for carbon trading, however, and push that discussion to 2019.

September 2019- UN General Secretary plans Climate Action Summit

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres organizes the UN Climate Action Summit for world leaders in New York. Countries are mandated by the Paris Agreement to submit revised NDCs by the following year, so the meeting is a chance for leaders to share their ideas. But leaders of the world’s top carbon-emitting countries, including the United States and China, do not attend. At the summit, Guterres asks countries to submit plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent by 2030 and reach carbon neutrality by 2050.

December 2019- Lack of progress at COP25 in Madrid (Spain)

COP25 is marked by a lack of progress on major climate issues despite a year of dire warnings from scientists, record heatwaves, and worldwide protests demanding action. Negotiators are unable to finalize rules for a global carbon market, and they disagree over whether to compensate developing countries devastated by effects of climate change including rising sea levels and extreme weather. The conference’s final declaration does not explicitly call on countries to increase their climate pledges made under the Paris Agreement, and Secretary-General Guterres describes the talks as a lost opportunity.

April 2020 - Talks postponed amid COVID-19 pandemic

The United Nations postpones COP26, originally scheduled for November 2020, until 2021 because of a pandemic of a new coronavirus disease, known as COVID-19. Countries were expected to strengthen their emissions reduction goals set under the Paris Agreement at the conference in Glasgow. Amid the pandemic, emissions fall worldwide as many countries implement nationwide shutdowns that drastically slow economic activity. But experts predict that the reductions won’t last, with governments under pressure to boost output and disregard the environment to save their struggling economies.

July 2021 – States update pledges ahead of COP26 in Glasgow (Scotland)

More than one hundred countries, altogether accounting for nearly 60 percent of Paris Agreement signatories, meet the deadline to submit updated NDCs ahead of COP26 in November. Some of the top emitters propose more ambitious targets. President Joe Biden announces that the United States will aim to cut its emissions to roughly half of its 2005 level by 2030, doubling President Obama’s commitment. Meanwhile, China and India, responsible for roughly one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2019, miss the deadline. An IPCC report [PDF] released the following month predicts that the world will reach or exceed 1.5°C of warming within the next two decades even if nations drastically cut emissions immediately.

2021 -  1.5°C goal maintained at COP26 in Glasgow

COP26 President Alok Sharma says commitments made during the conference keep the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting warming to 1.5°C “alive” but its “pulse is weak.” The final agreement, the Glasgow Climate Pact, calls for countries to reduce coal use and fossil fuel subsidies—both firsts for a UN climate agreement—and urges governments to submit more ambitious emissions-reduction targets by the end of 2022. In addition, delegates finally establish rules for a global carbon market. Smaller groups of countries make notable side deals on deforestation, methane emissions, coal, and more. But analysts note that even if countries follow through on their pledges for 2030 and beyond, the world’s average temperature will still rise 2.1°C (3.8°F).

2022 - Breakthrough on Loss and Damage at COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh

At COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh, nations agree [PDF] for the first time to establish a fund to compensate poor and vulnerable countries for losses and damages due to climate change, though the details are left undecided. Also for the first time, the conference’s final communiqué calls for global financial institutions to revamp their practices to address the climate crisis. However, countries don’t commit to phasing down use of all fossil fuels, and a goal to reach peak emissions by 2025 is removed from the communiqué. Guterres says that continuing to use fossil fuels means “double trouble” for the planet.

*(Source: https://www.cfr.org/timeline/un-climate-talks)


 

lunedì 1 novembre 2021

CONVENTION CLIMATE CHANGE


 MESSAGE OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS

To His Excellency The Right Honourable Alok Sharma
President of COP26, the 26th Session of the Conference of Parties
to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

(Glasgow, 31 October – 12 November 2021)

 EN  - IT

Your Excellency,

As the Glasgow Conference begins, all of us are aware that it has the vital task of demonstrating to the entire international community whether there really exists a political will to devote – with honesty, responsibility and courage – greater human, financial and technological resources to mitigating the negative effects of climate change and assisting the poorer and more vulnerable nations most affected by it. [1]

At the same time, we realize that this task has to be undertaken in the midst of a pandemic that for almost two years has devastated our human family.  Covid-19 has brought immense tragedies in its wake, but it has also taught us that, if we are to succeed in overcoming the pandemic, there is no alternative: all of us must play a part in responding to this challenge. And that, as we know, calls for profound solidarity and fraternal cooperation between the world’s peoples.

Our post-pandemic world will necessarily be different from what it was before the pandemic. It is that world which we must now build, together, starting from the recognition of past mistakes.

Something similar could be said of our efforts to tackle the global problem of climate change. There is no alternative. We can achieve the goals set by the Paris Agreement only if we act in a coordinated and responsible way. Those goals are ambitious, and they can no longer be deferred. Today it is up to you to take the necessary decisions.

COP26 can and must offer an effective contribution to the conscientious construction of a future in which daily actions and economic and financial investments can genuinely protect the conditions that ensure a dignified and humane life for the men and women of today and tomorrow, on a “healthy” planet.

We find ourselves facing an epochal change, a cultural challenge that calls for commitment on the part of all, particularly those countries possessed of greater means. These countries need to take a leading role in the areas of climate finance, decarbonization in the economic system and in people’s lives, the promotion of a circular economy, providing support to more vulnerable countries working to adapt to the impact of climate change and to respond to the loss and damage it has caused.

For its part, the Holy See, as I stated to the High Level Virtual Climate Ambition Summit of 12 December 2020, has adopted a strategy of net-zero emissions operating on two levels: 1) the commitment of Vatican City State to achieve this goal by 2050; and 2) the commitment of the Holy See to promote education in integral ecology. We fully realize that political, technical and operational measures need to be linked to an educational process that, especially among young people, can promote new lifestyles and favour a cultural model of development and of sustainability centered on fraternity and on the covenant between human beings and the natural environment. These commitments have given rise to thousands of initiatives worldwide.

Along these same lines, on 4 October last, I joined a number of religious leaders and scientists in signing a Joint Appeal in view of COP26. On that occasion, we listened to the voices of representatives of many faiths and spiritual traditions, many cultures and scientific fields. Very different voices, with very different sensitivities. Yet what clearly emerged was a remarkable convergence on the urgent need for a change of direction, a decisive resolve to pass from the “throwaway culture” prevalent in our societies to a “culture of care” for our common home and its inhabitants, now and in the future.

The wounds inflicted on our human family by the Covid-19 pandemic and the phenomenon of climate change are comparable to those resulting from a global conflict. Today, as in the aftermath of the Second World War, the international community as a whole needs to set as a priority the implementation of collegial, solidary and farsighted actions.

We need both hope and courage. Humanity possesses the wherewithal to effect this change, which calls for a genuine conversion, individual as well as communitarian, and a decisive will to set out on this path. It will entail the transition towards a more integral and integrating model of development, based on solidarity and on responsibility. A transition that must also take into serious consideration the effects it will have on the world of labour.

Especial care must likewise be shown for the most vulnerable peoples, in whose regard there is a growing “ecological debt” related to commercial imbalances with environmental repercussions and to the disproportionate use of the natural resources of one’s own and of other countries. [2] There is no denying this.

The “ecological debt” raises in some ways the issue of foreign debt, the burden of which often hinders the development of peoples. [3] The post-pandemic world can and must restart from a consideration of all these aspects, along with the setting in place of carefully negotiated procedures for forgiving foreign debt, linked to a more sustainable and just economic restructuring aimed at meeting the climate emergency. “The developed countries ought to help pay the ecological debt by significantly limiting their consumption of nonrenewable energy and by assisting poorer countries to support policies and programmes of sustainable development”. [4] A development in which, at last, everyone can participate.

Sadly, we must acknowledge how far we remain from achieving the goals set for tackling climate change. We need to be honest: this cannot continue! Even as we were preparing for COP26, it became increasingly clear that there is no time to waste. All too many of our brothers and sisters are suffering from this climate crisis. The lives of countless people, particularly those who are most vulnerable, have experienced its increasingly frequent and devastating effects. At the same time, we have come to realize that it also involves a crisis of children’s rights and that, in the near future, environmental migrants will be more numerous than refugees from war and conflicts. Now is the time to act, urgently, courageously and responsibly. Not least, to prepare a future in which our human family will be in a position to care for itself and for the natural environment.

The young, who in recent years have strongly urged us to act, will only inherit the planet we choose to leave to them, based on the concrete choices we make today. Now is the moment for decisions that can provide them with reasons for hope and trust in the future.

I had hoped to be with you in person, but that was not possible. I accompany you, however, with my prayers as you take these important decisions.

Please accept, Mr President, my cordial greetings and good wishes.

From the Vatican, 29 October 2021

FRANCIS

 

domenica 8 agosto 2021

ONU - PUEBLOS INDIGENAS

 


9 de agosto, Día Internacional de los Pueblos Indígenas

La Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas declaró que el Día Internacional de los Pueblos Indígenas del Mundo se celebrara el 9 de agosto de cada año.

Los pueblos indígenas son poseedores de una gran diversidad de culturas, tradiciones, idiomas y sistemas de conocimiento únicos. Tienen una relación especial con sus tierras y diversos conceptos de desarrollo basados en sus propias cosmovisiones y prioridades.

Bajo el mandato de la UNESCO, varios programas tratan temas de migración y movilidad que son relevantes para los pueblos indígenas. En estos temas, la UNESCO centra sus actividades en temas relacionados con la inclusión y la diversidad para combatir todas las formas de discriminación.

 

Tema de este año: No dejar a nadie atrás. Pueblos indígenas y la llamada a un nuevo contrato social

El nuevo contrato social debe basarse en una auténtica participación y asociación que fomente la igualdad de oportunidades y respete los derechos, la dignidad y las libertades de todos. Y ello pasa por el derecho de los pueblos indígenas a participar en la adopción de decisiones, un componente clave para lograr la reconciliación entre los pueblos originarios y los Estados.

Es por ello que este 9 de agosto, Día Internacional de los Pueblos Indígenas, debemos reivindicar su inclusión, participación y aprobación en la constitución de un sistema con beneficios sociales y económicos para todos y todas.

 

"El 9 de agosto de cada año, el Día Internacional de los Pueblos Indígenas es una oportunidad para celebrar estas comunidades y sus conocimientos. El tema de este año gira en torno a la elaboración de un nuevo contrato social con los pueblos indígenas, que esté fundado en los derechos humanos y el respeto a la diversidad cultural, y que no deje a nadie atrás"

Mensaje de la Directora General de la UNESCO, Audrey Azoulay, con motivo de este día:
Descargue el mensaje completo en pdf

 

Entrevista

 

 

Voces docentes: “Sueño una educación que reconozca las necesidades educativas de los pueblos originarios”
Los pueblos indígenas son herederos de una gran diversidad lingüística y cultural, así como de costumbres y tradiciones ancestrales. Conocimos la experiencia de la docente mapuche Anahí Arlette Huencho Ramos y sus proyectos de etnomatemática.
Lea más

Ciclo de conversatorios en Chile

 

Pueblos indígenas, interculturalidad y nueva Constitución en Chile
La Oficina Regional para la Educación en América Latina y el Caribe (OREALC/UNESCO Santiago) organizó un ciclo de conversatorios que reunió a representantes de la academia, organizaciones indígenas y público interesado. Abordamos temas relevantes para la discusión constitucional en Chile.
Lea más

 

martedì 23 febbraio 2021

INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS MUST BE DEFENDED - en- fr- es- de

            Archbishop Gallagher to UN:

 Inalienable human 

rights must be defended

 

The Vatican Secretary for Relations with States sends a video message to the United Nations, and highlights the inalienable nature of human rights that must be respected, even amid measures implemented to curb the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic.

 By Fr. Benedict Mayaki, SJ

 The Vatican's Secretary for Relations with States, Archbishop Paul Richard Gallagher, has called on the United Nations to “rediscover the foundation of human rights, in order to implement them in an authentic fashion”, as the world continues to take measures to combat the Covid-19 pandemic.

Archbishop Gallagher made this appeal in a video message during the 46th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), which commenced on Monday in Geneva, Switzerland. The four-week-long session, held virtually due to the ongoing health emergency, kicks off with a 3-day high-level segment when heads of states and dignitaries representing various countries and regions will address the council by video.

For over a year now, Archbishop Gallagher noted, “the Covid-19 pandemic has been impacting every aspect of life, causing the loss of many and casting doubt on our economic, social, and health systems.” At the same time, “it has also challenged our commitment to the protection and promotion of universal human rights, while at the same time asserting their relevance.”

Recalling Pope Francis’s words in his latest Encyclical Fratelli tuttiArchbishop Gallagher underscored its relevance to our time, noting that “by acknowledging the dignity of each human person, we can contribute to the rebirth of a universal aspiration to fraternity.”

Human rights are unconditional

The Archbishop highlighted that the Preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that “the recognition of the inherent dignity of all members of the human family and of the equal and inalienable rights constitutes the foundation of freedom, justice and peace.” Likewise, the UN Charter asserts its "faith in fundamental of human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women, and of nations large and small.”

He pointed out that these two documents recognize an objective truth – that every human person is innately and universally endowed by human dignity. This truth, he further stressed, “is not conditioned by time, place, culture or context.”

Acknowledging that this solemn commitment “is easier to pronounce than to achieve and practice,” he lamented that these objectives are “still far from being recognized, respected, protected and promoted in every situation.”

Rights are not separated from universal values

Archbishop Gallagher went on to affirm that the true promotion of fundamental human rights depends on the underlying foundation from which they derive.

He, therefore, warned that any practice or system that would treat rights in an abstract fashion – separated from pre-existing and universal values – risks undermining their raison d’être, and in such a context, “human rights institutions become susceptible to prevailing fashions, prevailing visions or ideologies”.

The Archbishop further cautioned that "in such a context of rights devoid of values, systems may impose obligations or penalties that were never envisioned by state parties, which may contradict the values they were supposed to promote." He added that they may even “presume to create so-called 'new' rights that lack an objective foundation, thus drifting away from their purpose of serving human dignity.”

The right to life

Illustrating the inseparability of rights from values with the example of the right to life, Archbishop Gallagher applauded that its content has been “progressively extended by countering acts of torture, enforced disappearances and the death penalty; and by protecting the elderly, the migrant, children and motherhood.” He said these developments are reasonable extensions to the right of life as they maintain their fundamental basis in the inherent good of life, and also because “life, before being a right, is first and foremost a good to be cherished and protected.”

Archbishop Gallagher stressed, however, that there is a risk "of undermining the value a right is intended to uphold when it is divorced from its fundamental basis." He noted, for example, an unfortunate precedent in the Human Rights Committee's general comments 36 on the right to life, which "far from protecting human life and dignity, twists its meaning to imply the right to assisted suicide and to end the lives of unborn children."

Covid-19 measures and human rights

In the face of the current Covid-19 pandemic, the Archbishop highlighted that some measures implemented by public authorities to ensure public health impinged on the free exercise of human rights.

In this regard, he proposed that “any limitations on the exercise of human rights for the protection of public health must stem from a situation of strict necessity,” because “a number of persons, finding themselves in situations of vulnerability – such as the elderly, migrants, refugees, indigenous people, internally displaced persons, and children – have been disproportionately affected by the current crisis.”

Any limitations imposed in an emergency situation, he insisted, “must be proportional to the situation, applied in a non-discriminatory fashion, and used only when no other means are available.”

Freedom of religion

Archbishop Gallagher also reiterated the urgency of protecting the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, noting in particular that “religious belief, and the expression thereof, lies at the core of the dignity of the human person in his or her conscience.”

Highlighting that the global response to the Covid-19 pandemic reveals that “this robust understanding of religious freedom is being eroded,” the Archbishop re-echoed the Holy See’s insistance that, “freedom of religion also protects its public witness and expression, both individually and collectively, publicly and privately, in forms of worship, observance and teaching," as numerous human rights instruments recognize. 

To respect the inherent value of this right, therefore, the Archbishop recommends that political authorities should engage with religious leaders, as well as leaders of faith-based organizations and civil society committed to promoting freedom of religion and conscience.

Human fraternity, multilateralism

Archbishop Gallagher noted that the current crisis presents us with a unique opportunity to approach multilateralism “as the expression of a renewed sense of global responsibility, of solidarity grounded in justice and the attainment of peace and unity within the human family, which is God’s plan for the world.”

Recalling Pope Francis’ invitation in the Fratelli tutti encouraging everyone to acknowledge the dignity of each human person in order to promote universal fraternity, he encouraged all to be willing to move beyond that which divides us in order to effectively combat the consequences of the various crises.

Concluding his message, the Archbishop reaffirmed the Holy See’s commitment to engage collaboratively to this end.

 

Vatican News

 

Gallagher a la ONU: Derechos humanos inalienables deben ser defendidos

 

Mgr Gallagher: en temps de pandémie, attention à la protection des droits de l'homme

 

Vatikan an UN: Menschenrechte authentisch umsetzen

 

 

 

 

sabato 23 gennaio 2021

ONU . JOURNEE INTERNATIONAL DE L'EDUCATION - fr - en - es





Relancer et redynamiser l’éducation 

pour la génération COVID-19

Cette troisième édition de la Journée internationale de l'éducation intervient au lendemain de la pandémie de COVID-19 qui a entraîné, à l’échelle mondiale, une perturbation de l'apprentissage d'une ampleur et d'une gravité sans précédent. La fermeture des écoles, des universités et autres établissements d'enseignement, ainsi que l'interruption de nombreux programmes d'alphabétisation et d'apprentissage tout au long de la vie, ont bouleversé la vie de 1,6 milliard d’apprenants dans plus de 190 pays. En ce début d'année, le moment est venu d'intensifier la collaboration et la solidarité internationale en vue de placer l'éducation et l'apprentissage tout au long de la vie au centre des efforts de relance et de transformation vers des sociétés plus inclusives, plus sûres et plus durables.

La célébration mondiale de cette Journée sera axée sur trois thèmes principaux : les héros de l’apprentissage, l’innovation et le financement. Elle sera organisée en partenariat avec le Bureau de liaison de l’UNESCO à New York, le Siège de l’ONU, le Partenariat mondial pour l’éducation et le Centre d’études interdisciplinaires (CRI), et pourra compter sur la présence de partenaires de la Coalition mondiale pour l’éducation. Dans l’esprit de la Journée internationale de l’éducation, le CRI et l’UNESCO coordonnent le #LearningPlanet Festival – ou « Festival de l’Apprendre », destiné à célébrer l’apprentissage dans tous les contextes et à partager les innovations permettant de réaliser le potentiel de chaque apprenant, quelles que soient les circonstances dans lesquelles il ou elle se trouve. À cette occasion, le CRI annoncera également les noms des gagnants du concours de rédaction « Le Petit Prince ».

L'éducation est un droit humain

Le droit à l'éducation est inscrit dans l'article 26 de la Déclaration universelle des droits de l'homme, qui exige que l'enseignement élémentaire soit gratuit et obligatoire. La Convention relative aux droits de l'enfant, adoptée en 1989, demande de plus que les pays rendent l'enseignement supérieur accessible à tous.

L'éducation est essentielle au développement durable

Avec l'adoption du Programme de développement durable à l'horizon 2030 en septembre 2015, la communauté internationale reconnaît que l'éducation est aussi un facteur indispensable pour le succès de tous ses 17 objectifs. Elle y consacre un objectif à part entière, l'objectif de développement durable n°4, qui veut « assurer l’accès de tous à une éducation de qualité, sur un pied d’égalité, et promouvoir les possibilités d’apprentissage tout au long de la vie ».

Éducation universelle : enjeux et défis

L’éducation offre aux enfants la possibilité de sortir de la pauvreté et de s’engager sur la voie d’un avenir prometteur. Cependant, dans le monde, plus de 265 millions d’enfants ne sont actuellement pas scolarisés. Plus d'un cinquième d’entre eux sont en âge de fréquenter l’école primaire. La pauvreté, la discrimination, les conflits armés, les situations d’urgence et les effets du changement climatique sont autant de facteurs qui rendent l'accès à l'école difficile. La migration et les déplacements forcés affectent aussi négativement l'éducation des enfants, comme le montre l'édition 2019 du Rapport mondial de suivi sur l'éducation. À ces défis se sont ajoutés récemment le manque de soutien des enseignant(e)s, l'absence de données sur les personnes exclues de l'éducation, les infrastructures inappropriées, le manque de volonté politique et de soutien communautaire, le financement non ciblé et les politiques qui ne sont pas accompagnées de mécanismes de suivis, comme souligné dans l’édition 2020 de ce même rapport

 

Recover and revitalize education for the COVID-19 generation

Restaurar y revitalizar la educación para la generación COVID-19