venerdì 27 ottobre 2023

SYNOD BRIEFING: A NEW WAY TO BE THE CHURCH


 At the Synod press briefing on Friday, Dr. Paolo Ruffini reveals how the final Synthesis Report will be voted at the Assembly, and Fr. Timothy Radcliffe asserts that fear of synodality grows out of misunderstanding of its true purpose.

 

-By Osservatore Romano

 



"Let us not grow weary of praying incessantly for peace."

 With these words, Cardinal Mario Grech, Secretary General of the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops, opened the proceedings in the Paul VI Hall on Friday morning, recalling that “today is a day of fasting and prayer for peace." The entire Assembly is scheduled to gather at 6 p.m. in St. Peter's Basilica for the Rosary and Eucharistic Adoration with Pope Francis.

 This was announced by Dr. Paolo Ruffini, Prefect of the Dicastery for Communication and President of the Information Commission of the Synod, during Friday’s press briefing, which began at 2:20 p.m. in the Holy See Press Office and was introduced by Deputy Director Cristiane Murray.

 Dr. Ruffini: Towards the vote on the "Synthesis Report"

"At this morning's General Congregation, there were 320 members present due to concurrent commitments in the Roman Curia and other meetings," Dr. Ruffini stated in reporting on the progress of the synodal works. "After prayer and before the discussion in the Circles and the free interventions—aimed at gathering questions, suggestions, and proposals regarding the next phase of the synodal process that will accompany us until October of the coming year—some information was given regarding the final drafting of the Synthesis Report."

 "Yesterday, at the end of the discussion on the first draft of the Report," the Prefect explained, "we collected 1,125 collective 'modi' from the Circles and 126 individual 'modi.' All 'modi' have been and will be taken into consideration out of respect for those who submitted them. The reception work is still ongoing. The writers and experts, to whom the Assembly offered a round of applause in gratitude, are working, even at night, to prepare the updated version of the text."

 Dr. Ruffini clarified that "the intent is to first consider those 'modi' that have garnered broad consensus, so they can find their place in the updated text. After incorporating the 'modi' submitted by the Working Groups, the text will be examined this evening during the meeting of the Commission for the Synthesis Report."

 "In accordance with Article 33 § 2 of the Instruction on the Celebration of Synodal Assemblies," the Prefect added, "the Commission will be called to approve the text by an absolute majority. Subsequently, between tonight and tomorrow morning," he continued, "the final version of the text will be prepared, and tomorrow morning, the General Congregation scheduled in the calendar will not take place. Members will receive the text tomorrow mid-morning, and the official versions will be in English and Italian."

 "In this way," Dr. Ruffini stressed, "an effort has been made to provide everyone with sufficient time to read the Synthesis Report in its final version in advance, so they can better prepare for the afternoon vote. The text given to the members is strictly confidential and may not be disseminated in any way."

 "Tomorrow afternoon, the General Congregation will begin thirty minutes early, at 3:30 p.m.," the Prefect continued, explaining, "In the first part of tomorrow afternoon's General Congregation, the entire Synthesis Report will be read. After individual members have read it, the text will be collectively reread by the Assembly. Following this, the electronic vote will take place, allowing for the expression of individual votes on each paragraph of the text. To clarify the voting process this morning, a simulated vote was conducted at the end of the General Congregation. The secrecy of the vote was reaffirmed this morning. The system encrypts the data collected, preventing the identification of those who cast their votes."

 Going into the details of tomorrow's vote, Dr. Ruffini said, "On the screen of each tablet provided to the Synod members, the number of each chapter of the Report and all paragraphs marked with alphabetical letters will appear. Each member must cast their vote—yes or no—for each paragraph. According to Article 35 § 3 of the Instruction on the Celebration of Synodal Assemblies, abstention is not allowed. In accordance with § 4 of the same Article 35 of the Instruction, individual paragraphs are considered approved with a two-thirds majority of the members present at the vote."

 Dr. Ruffini also disclosed that "today, the Synod members were provided with meditations offered by Father Timothy Radcliffe, who was present at the briefing, during the spiritual retreat in Sacrofano. These meditations are compiled in a book available in Italian and English. And, by the express desire of the Holy Father as a gift to the Synod participants, a book (available in four languages: Italian, English, French, and Spanish) was published, containing the four letters that Father Radcliffe addressed to the Dominican Order during the years he served as the Master General."

 "On Sunday, the Eucharistic celebration for the conclusion of the Synod will be held at 10 a.m. in St. Peter's Basilica," the Prefect recalled. In conclusion, Dr. Ruffini revealed, "This morning's works were introduced by the current delegated President, Ibrahim Isaac Sedrak, Patriarch of Alexandria of the Copts."

 Pires: Toward greater synodal engagement

Sheila Pires, Secretary of the Information Commission, then presented the framework and contents of the interventions in the Working Groups, all focused on the subsequent phase in October 2024. The theme of the day was sharing ideas and proposals on methods and steps for the next phase of the synodal process before the second session.

 Many participants, she said, suggested that the duration of the next Assembly should be three weeks, not four. They also proposed allowing more time for personal reflection and meditation, fostering better participation through interventions in the Assembly. More group meetings were requested, based not so much on language but on each individual's background.

 Among the proposals was a brief summary of the Synthesis Document in more understandable language for everyone, especially for young people. It was also emphasized in the Hall "the importance of bringing 'conversations in the Spirit' to the communities to avoid the risk of discussions being disconnected from the concrete life of the people of God." Furthermore, "it was suggested to involve local communities at all levels, following a synodal path." Finally, Ms. Pires concluded, "proposals were made to apply synodality and co-responsibility, making good use of the possibilities already provided by canon law to involve young people, women, and deacons."

 Mother Angelini: Bringing Benedictine experience to the Halll

Mother Maria Ignazia Angelini, a Benedictine from the Viboldone Monastery, acted as a spiritual assistant at the Synod. She first confided that "this role deeply suits me, as I participate in listening and prayer and interact with the Synod members during the various breaks between the Working Groups. I come from a monastic experience within the Church, an experience that has been marginal since its origins but with a prophetic charge, and I think of Saint Benedict."

 Significantly, she continued, "being able to represent my absolute insignificance in this continuous thread of meaning in the history of the Church, stationed at the root of the issues that have been addressed, the root expressed in the monastic perspective on the life of the Church through the study of the Scriptures, prayer, and fraternal relationships, which becomes welcoming."

 From this perspective, the Benedictine nun further underscored the "revolutionary" nature of the Synod, "a change in the life of the Church, in the sense of inclusivity in presence," with "an opening in the ability to listen to differences, in the ability to look at reality, at a complex and indecipherable moment in history that calls for faith to provide a vision from the highest perspective, where the presence of God becomes flesh."

 "The Scriptures give us profound and luminous criteria for interpreting such terrible moments in history," Mother Angelini continued, praising the "profoundly innovative" way in which cardinals, bishops, theologians, and laity have come together, despite their differences, to pray together and listen to each other. It will be important, she concluded, "to see how we will move forward from this experience."

 Father Radcliffe: Learning synodal style together

Father Timothy Peter Joseph Radcliffe, a Dominican from the British Monastery of Oxford, also spoke as a spiritual assistant at the Synod. He mentioned that synodality is a part of the Dominican way of life, founded eight hundred years ago, in which decisions are made together. Being at his fourth Synod, he observed that this one is truly different from the others. "This is an extraordinary change in the way we are the Church together," he said, noting that simply seeing cardinals and young women from Latin America and Asia sitting together to talk is transformative from the perspective of people's experiences and being the Church.

 However, he assured, "it is certainly still a Synod of Bishops because it reveals very clearly what it means to be representatives of the episcopal college not as solitary individuals, but as bishops immersed in the conversation of their people," through "listening, speaking, learning together."

 Father Radcliffe also alluded to the changes for the Church's future that many expect: "This means that perhaps they are not looking for the right thing because we are gathered to understand how to be the Church in a new way, rather than making specific decisions; how we can be a Church that listens, and whose members listen to each other across different cultures, and listen to tradition over time. We are learning how to make decisions together, how to listen to each other: we are at the beginning of a learning process, so there will be obstacles and mistakes, and this is okay because we are on a journey."

 Moreover, he emphasized, "this learning process is of extraordinary importance today. We live in a world full of violence, with the breakdown of communication among people, as in the Middle East, Ukraine, and many parts of Africa, but also in our own countries, in Great Britain and the United States, where we see polarization. In some way, we must learn how to talk to each other and listen to each other. So, this Synod may not only be useful for healing the wounds of the Church but also for humanity."

 Frère Alois: A new way of being Church

Frère Alois, Prior of the Taizé Community since 2005, following the death of Frère Roger (he will leave office on 3 December, handing it over to Frère Matthew) and participating in the Synod as a "special invitee," began by quoting an expression confided to him by a Reformed pastor present in the Hall as a fraternal delegate: "This Synod is a profound experience of communion." These are significant words that testify to how the synodal assembly has genuinely been "open to all Christians and to the world." In this regard, Frère Alois recalled the ecumenical vigil held in St. Peter's Square on September 30, attended by representatives of various Christian churches and communities: "It is an image," he said, "of what we are currently experiencing in ecumenism; it is a kairos, an opening, a moment that allows us to advance in spiritual ecumenism" based on the awareness that "we are all baptized in Christ" and "part of one body." This, he added, "has been palpable throughout the Synod," especially in listening, simplicity, willingness to dialogue, and the joy of being together. "I truly hope that this style," he wished, "can spread to many places in the world" because the synodal process "is leading us into a new way of being the Church."

 No reason to fear of synodal method

In response to the first question from journalists, who asked if he considered himself one of the "builders" of this Synod in some way, given his books on communication that Pope Francis appreciated, Father Radcliffe said he did not have a particular role in this regard but participated in the common dialogue.

 

To the next question about the possibility of the Synod leading the Church to a new phase despite the skepticism of some, Frère Alois reiterated that he appreciated a certain evolution in the dialogue during the weeks of work. Participants from different cultural backgrounds tried to understand each other better, he said, stating that he was certain the Synod brought a transformation in their hearts according to "the path we all need to take together."

 Father Radcliffe echoed this by asserting that some people fear the synodal method because they do not understand it. They are afraid that synodal debates are political in nature and cause schisms, but the opposite is happening. "The Synod is an event of prayer and faith," he emphasized.

 In response to the question about what practical suggestions he would give to a parish priest to implement the concepts of this Synod, Father Radcliffe replied that the recurring theme of the Synod had been the criticism of clericalism. However, this should not alarm diocesan priests; instead, it is necessary to highlight every positive aspect of diocesan priesthood, its beauty, and to support the work of those who evangelize.

 When asked about any political readings of the Synod, Father Radcliffe emphasized that he did not believe that ideological conflict had emerged from the discussions. What had emerged were cultural differences. The beauty of Catholicism, he said, lies in welcoming people from all over the world because cultures have a beautiful diversity that enriches. What may be a concern for a particular cultural environment is not the same for those living elsewhere. Learning to be respectful of others' concerns, he said, is a much more important theme than ideological issues, which were not found in the Synod.

 In this regard, Brother Alois observed that we live in a world with increasing fears and anxieties. The temptation to embrace ideologies exists, but in the Church, one can truly go against the current and cross boundaries. He noted that this is evident with young people at Taizé, who want to be more understanding and respectful of different ways of expressing faith. In the Church, he concluded, a clearer way of living the beauty of diversity must be found.

 Father Radcliffe, in response to a question about the admission of homosexuals to the seminary, clarified that the issue is not exclusion but rather the fact that there are people who have made their sexuality "the center of their identity," which raises doubts about their suitability for the priesthood. When asked about the fruits the Synod can yield, the Dominican theologian reiterated that it was not just a dialogue exercise but primarily a sharing of experiences, appreciating everyone's openness to "the lives and experiences of people from different places." In the same vein, the Prior of Taizé emphasized how the method of listening had been fruitful, although it would take time to see the results of what was sown. He also appreciated the fact that "in this assembly, a space for listening has been provided following a profoundly evangelical method."

 Responding to a question about young people, Mother Angelini said that as she had not participated in the Working Groups, defined as a fruitful moment for experiencing the "transition from 'I' to 'we,'" her perspective is partial. However, it allowed her to grasp the seriousness of the problem. She explained the need for the Church to find an appropriate language, especially in the digital world and in the communication of new media, as well as a liturgical language that is outdated for the new generations. In this regard, the Synod highlighted the need for conversion.

 Mother Angelini continued by emphasizing that the presence of the Taizé brothers at the ecumenical prayer on 30 September was a significant moment. She stated that it now falls on the members of the Synod to bring these concerns to local Churches by identifying places for mutual listening to address the major issue of young people's absence from ecclesiastical life. Since this need was expressed at the Synod, Mother Angelini continued, it is now necessary to mediate and pray for places where young people feel called, attracted, and involved in a process of ecclesiastical conversion, not just personal dialogue. They need to share their stories and be included in paths of discernment, reading of history, and practical decision-making in their local churches.

 In response to a question, Dr. Ruffini reaffirmed that abstaining from the vote would not be possible and referred to the proposals discussed by each Group. In practice, the path from this point to the next assembly is still in progress and requires further discernment in dioceses. One significant aspect is how to involve the people of God, who live in very different places, which can be in a state of war or suffering, in a journey in which they are involved. The observations must be submitted to the Commission by tonight for them to be considered or for proposals to be made. Father Radcliffe added, "This is the first time that non-bishops have the right to vote."

 In response to a question about the importance of healing the wounds of humanity, Father Radcliffe said it is necessary to "try to reach out to wounded people and take care of them." He mentioned the experience of Luca Casarini, a Synod participant who is involved in saving migrants at sea. "Taking care of one another allows us to heal the wounds of others, and listening to the voices of wounded people is very important because it enables us to help them in their healing," he concluded.

 Regarding a possible direct connection between the Synod's reflection and the morning's statement concerning Father Rupnik - with the Pope's decision to waive the statute of limitations to allow a canonical procedure to take place – Dr. Ruffini said, "I don't think there is a connection with what the Synod has repeatedly emphasized and what the Church has been doing for years to address the issue of abuse and to undertake a journey of penance, which did not begin today, and work on the new rules that have been approved."

 The Synod, however, does not deal with individual cases, Dr. Ruffini added, emphasizing the important role of Pope Francis in the fight against abuse.

 

Vatican News

lunedì 23 ottobre 2023

UNESCO - UN POEME POUR LA PAIX

 

         

 CONCOURS « UN POEME POUR LA PAIX »

ECOLE BUSANDULUSHI DE SAKANIA  A  PARIS

 

Nous membres de l’UMEC, nous avons participé à la remise du prix du Concours international de poésie francophone 2023 – Un poème pour la paix.

 Ce concours a été organisé sous le haut patronage de la Commission Nationale Française et de la Commission Nationale Ivoirienne pour l’UNESCO.

 Parmi les 500 candidats, les élèves de l’Ecole salésienne Busandulushi de Sakania dans la Province du Haut-Katanga ont participé à ce concours et Busandulushi a été parmi les écoles lauréates. Nous remercions le Père Paulin Longwa et le Professeur Jean Micky qui ont valorisé ce « Poème pour la Paix ».

 Nous exprimons notre gratitude

-          au président de l’Académie de la Poésie Française monsieur Thierry Sajat

-          aux représentant de l’Association Montessori (AMI)

-          aux membres de l’Organisation Mondiale pour l’Education Préscolaire (OMEP)

-          aux membres de l’Association de Médiation Humaniste (AMH)

-          aux membres du  Printemps des Poètes

 Pour cette créativité de nous rassembler pour encourager les talents dans le monde et pour soutenir les initiatives de construire un monde de paix par la poésie.

 L’UMEC encourage cette action du concours qui appelle tout le monde à marcher avec l’objectif de soutenir chaque éducateur à être poète de la paix à chaque instant. Notons qu’il n’y a pas d’éducation sans la paix et il n’y a pas de paix sans l’éducation.

 A cette belle cérémonie tenue à Paris ce 21 Octobre 2023, l’UMEC a été représentée par madame Christine Roche et Albert Kabuge. Nous tenons à remercier les responsables de l’UMEC qui ont accordé cette participation à ce concours qui fait des élèves de Busandulushi les poètes de la paix et qui sont comptés parmi les lauréats de l’Académie de la Poésie Française.

 Nous sommes dans l’attente pour le prochain concours et nous serons disponibles pour y participer avec notre structure pour que nous construisions ensemble la PAIX  et que cette PAIX soit un comportement dans le quotidien de notre vie.

 

Kabuge Albert, représentant de l’UMEC à Paris



 


 

 

martedì 17 ottobre 2023

THE RIGHT OF ISRAEL

 

 - by Giuseppe Savagnone*



  Just a group of terrorists?

 In the face of the savage violence of Hamas's attack on Israel, the horror and unconditional solidarity of almost the entire Western world appear fully justified. A solidarity that immediately extended to the Jewish state's reactions to its attackers. 'Israel has the right to defend itself', was the phrase that resounded on the lips of politicians, of intellectuals, and which Pope Francis also made his own.

  There is, however, something unsaid in this incontrovertible statement that should be clarified, and that concerns the recipients and modalities of this defensive action.

  "We will crush terrorists, like Isis," Netanyahu promised. The question, however, is whether we are really only in front of a group of terrorists, of whom the two million people living in the Gaza Strip, controlled by Hamas (one million two hundred thousand are Palestinian refugees) would be "hostages", as Giuliano Ferrara claimed at the torchlight procession for Israel.

  In reality, the recent history of Gaza strongly casts doubt on this narrative. The Israelis (who in 1967 had wrested it from Egypt in the 'six-day war') withdrew in 2005, leaving it under the control of the Palestinian National Authority, with which the Tel Aviv government, in the Oslo accords, had made a pact back in 1993. But in the elections held the following year, in 2006, it was not this more moderate fringe that won, but the extremist Islamic movement of Hamas, which has been in power ever since.

  An outcome due to the growing discredit of the Palestinian Authority, which, under the leadership of the former President Abu Mazen, has long since lost all determination in claiming the rights of the Palestinian people and is increasingly drowning in corruption. So much so that today, even in the West Bank, the other territory of Palestine where Abu Mazen is still in power, he has avoided calling new elections for years because all the polls predict, should they take place, the sure victory of Hamas.

  Not even in Gaza, in fact, have there been new elections since 2006. And it is certainly not a liberal regime, as demonstrated by the systematic repression of women's rights - along the same lines as Iran, the Shiite Islamic state to which Hamas is closest - and of all opponents in general.

  A people of despair

 But to rally behind its government the people of the Strip came to the rescue, against its own intentions, precisely Israel which, in reaction to the 2006 election results, imposed a total embargo on the region, with a suffocating control of people and goods entering or leaving, leading to a disheartening condition of dependence and a further impoverishment of the inhabitants.

  The International Red Cross declared the illegality of this policy, which entailed 'collective punishment for the people living in the Gaza Strip' - two million human beings -, turning it into what the non-governmental organisation Human Rights Watch called 'an open-air prison' last year, but to no avail.

  Thus, social anger - exasperated by these ruthless measures and the Palestinian Authority's culpable inertia - pushed the new generations into the arms of Hamas, which ended up expressing the despair of a hopeless people. In the end, today it is this people that is the real target of Israel's 'defence' action.

  It is, after all, also for logistical reasons. 'We must liberate Gaza even with bombs, even with tanks, even with the army', Giuliano Ferrara shouted to roaring applause in his fiery speech.

  But in a territory that is among the most densely populated in the world, with two million people crammed into an area of 360 square kilometres, the bombs are inevitably destined to hit mostly civilians. The toll of six days of air raids on the Strip is more than 1,500 dead, including 500 children.

  So it was with the embargo imposed by Israel in 2007. So it is now for the total blockade of fuel, water and light with which the Jewish State has responded to the Hamas attack. It is not only the 'terrorists' who are suffering, but the poor people, men, women and children, who are at the point of exhaustion. Even hospitals report that they can no longer operate their equipment, starting with operating theatres and incubators to save the lives of newborn babies, without electricity.

  It is strange that so many acute Western observers - journalists, political personalities, intellectuals - rightly horrified at the 'slaughter of the innocent' perpetrated by Hamas, have nothing to object, indeed in many cases applaud, this massacre of Palestinian children and women.

On this line of ruthless violence towards the population is also the latest order given by the Israeli military command, which ordered the evacuation within 24 hours of the north of the Strip. In this way, the poor people of this area - one million human beings, many of whom had already been driven out of their land, taken by the Israelis, and were living there as refugees - are forced, from one day to the next, to abandon their homes, their poor jobs, their world.

  A counter-terrorism that looks like terrorism

 But with this we are also faced with the answer to the second question, that of how. A few days ago, an out-of-the-blue newspaper headlined: 'Counter-terrorism is triggered. It looks a lot like terrorism'. Where the difference between war and terrorism is that the former is still subject to rules, established internationally, and targets enemy military personnel in order to destroy them, while the latter has no rules and, rather than defeating an army, aims to terrorise the civilian population.

  Now, in reality, this is the tactic of Hamas, which certainly cannot compete with Israel's military apparatus, but - as it did in the last attack - aims to strike the adversary by sowing fear. However, the tactics of the Jewish State are also very similar to this, as it knows full well that it cannot strike at the heart of the Hamas fighters - protected by a network of 45 km of fortified underground tunnels - with its air raids, but inflicts on the Palestinian population, in addition to the bombs, a series of hardships and inconveniences, in the hope (which has turned out to be fallacious, as we saw earlier) of detaching it from the armed organisation, without realising that it is playing its own game.

  Also part of this style is the Israeli air force's use of weapons banned by international conventions, such as white phosphorus bombs, which are banned by international conventions because they cause terrible burns and, in those who survive, serious illnesses.

  If the Jewish children burned by Hamas arouse our horror, no less so does the thought that there are so many Palestinians suffering the same fate these days. A tragic symmetry of monstrosities, which, absurdly, is not reflected in the assessments of Western public opinion, rightly shocked by the former, strangely insensitive to the latter.

 The importance of memory

 But the dramatic events of these days must be understood in the light of a history, which certainly cannot be invoked to mitigate the absolute condemnation of the atrocities committed by Hamas, even if it helps to understand their origin.

 A history that begins in 1947, when a United Nations General Assembly resolution established the constitution and coexistence of a Jewish and a Palestinian state. Jerusalem was to be an international zone.

 Although neither Palestinians nor Israelis ever accepted this partition, the former because they felt robbed of a land they had inhabited for almost two thousand years and from which they were now driven out, the latter because they saw in it the possibility of a return to their origins and wanted it all.

 In reality, more than seventy-five years later, that resolution remains unfulfilled. The Palestinian state never came into being and the territories that should have been itss, according to the UN resolution, are illegally occupied by Israel, except for the Gaza Strip and part of the West Bank, which do not even have territorial continuity. As for Jerusalem, it was proclaimed capital of Israel in 1980.

  What is more, in the territories that still remain to the Palestinians and are under its control, the Israeli government has in recent years multiplied new settlements of settlers, further violating the UN resolution.

  Since 2002, then, the Israeli government, in a decision condemned by the Court of Justice and the European Union, erected a fortified wall more than 300 km long separating the most important Palestinian territories in the West Bank from Israel, separating families and communities living and working on either side of the wall.

  The United Nations has explicitly declared these obvious prevarications illegal on several occasions, but neither Israel nor its allies - first and foremost the United States - took any notice of them.

  Lately, then, President Netanyahu - grappling with heavy accusations of corruption and needing, in order to escape prosecution, to strengthen the consensus of the extreme right, has endorsed others, this time going against the advice even of President Biden, who vainly tried to dissuade him. Then the deluge. Which, however, as should be clear, did not come 'out of the blue'.

To fight monsters

'The sleep of reason breeds monsters', wrote Goya. On both sides, many have been unleashed in this ruthless conflict, with appalling human costs. One does not solve the problem by erasing memory and reducing everything, as one tries to do, to a phenomenon of 'terrorism'.

  Hamas is not Isis, because it has behind it a people whose rights have been recognised by the UN and systematically trampled upon.

 In turn, one cannot claim to start, as Hamas does, from the premise that Israel has no right to exist. Only a mutual recognition - which for a moment seemed to have been achieved in Oslo - can constitute a real solution.

  It is necessary to strengthen, on both the Israeli and the Palestinian side, the fringes - which do exist - of reasonable people capable of reopening dialogue. Any justification of inhuman behaviour, on either side, is a favour done to the monster party.

  *Writer and Editorialist. Responsible for the website of the Pastoral Care of Culture of the Archdiocese of Palermo, www.tuttavia.eu

 

 

GAZA. BEING BORN IN A STRIP


The number one of Hamas (who currently resides in Qatar from where he released a video showing him praying to his God, thanking him for the massacre of Israelis by his people) is called Ismail Haniyeh and was born in 1962, the same year as I was born.

 

- by Vito Mancuso

    

The number two of Hamas (who is currently in the Gaza Strip and is already dead to the Israelis) is called Yahya Sinwar and was also born in 1962. I could have been their classmate, sitting in the same desk, playing ball together. Only on paper, of course, because in reality, while I was born in an industrious town in Brianza, part of a relatively prosperous nation-state, they were both born in a refugee camp in the Gaza Strip with no state to represent their nation (not by chance I had to write 'Strip', not state). What does it mean to be born in a Strip? What does it mean to be born and grow up in a refugee camp of people thrown out of their homes and expelled from their land, and without any credible prospect of being able to overcome that condition by finally having a nation-state and having a home again? It means growing up on bread and hate. Sometimes there may even be a lack of bread, hatred, however, never; indeed, it is certainly increased by the lack of bread.

It may be the same year I was born, but I cannot help but wonder what it would have been like for me to grow up in those conditions. What would I have become, having come into the world in the same year as Hamas number 1 and number 2, if I had been born there, to parents driven from their homes and their land, and seeing the hopes of re-establishing a modicum of decency in my living conditions instead of growing diminishing day by day to the point of non-existence?

 Do not think that this speech of mine is intended to justify or even judge less harshly the 7 October massacre perpetrated by Hamas militants, or rather terrorists. No, no justification of any kind. However, I am convinced that one should not deprive oneself of the intelligence that searches for the causes because only in this way can one get to the real root of the problems. One of the greatest Jewish thinkers of all time, Baruch Spinoza, whom I will quote extensively in this article, wrote: 'I have endeavoured hard not to deride, nor to pity, nor even to detest the actions of men, but to understand them' (Political Treatise, I, 4). Understanding: this is what it is all about, and so the question is: can the Hamas massacre be traced back to the conditions in which Palestinians have found themselves since 1948, which have become increasingly intolerable? "Can the 'largest open-air prison', as the Gaza Strip has rightly been called, and the continuous theft of land by Israeli settlers in the West Bank be a sufficient explanation for the murderous hatred of Hamas? To this question I answer no.

 I am not saying that the social and political situation of the Palestinian people is not at play in the genesis of that hatred; I am saying that it is not sufficient to explain the repeated beheading of Jewish children, taken as the most tragic symbol of the massive massacre. If the iniquitous conditions in Gaza were reason enough, we should logically conclude that the more than two million Palestinians in the Strip would be willing to perform the same act: all ready to slit defenceless little girls and boys' throats. Of course, I cannot know for sure that this is not really the case, but my reason refuses to proceed with such gross generalisations because its task is structurally another: distinction. Distinguishing is the job par excellence of properly conducted reasoning, and just as it cannot be inferred from the aggression and disregard for the property of others by Israeli settlers that all Israelis are ready to trample international law underfoot, so too it cannot be inferred from the Hamas massacre that all the inhabitants of the Gaza Strip are ready to commit the unspeakable crimes of a few days ago.

 But if socio-political conditions are not enough to understand the Hamas massacre, what other factors must be summoned? The answer is not difficult: hatred. Not hatred as a hotter-than-usual blaze of wrath that can sometimes set the soul on fire, no; far more radically, hatred as a persistent and systematic ideology that, coldly and totally in possession of its faculties, thinks of nothing else but the enemy and its elimination. Hatred as the fuel of a human being's life. Because this is the point: that one can make hatred one's source of energy, one's life source, one's reason for existing. Hate can lend a kind of macabre vitality and lucidity to the mind.

Said Sami Modiano, a survivor of Auschwitz: 'It is not true that hatred is blind, it has very sharp eyesight, that of a sniper, and if it falls asleep its sleep is never eternal, it returns'. And that hatred has very sharp eyesight is shown by the thoroughness with which Hamas prepared and conducted the massacre.

 Back to its leaders. One can be born in the same year, in the same city or refugee camp, even in the same family, and have different, even opposite lives. Fortunately or unfortunately, we are indeterminate beings. Fortunately or unfortunately, freedom does exist. Another Auschwitz survivor, the Viennese Jewish psychologist Victor Frankl, reflecting on conditions in the death camp, wrote: 'Everything that happens to the soul of man is the result of an internal decision. In principle, every man, even if conditioned by very grave external circumstances, can in some way decide what will become of himself'. One can read the Koran and draw from it teachings of hatred and violence; one can read it and draw from it teachings of love and peace. The same applies to the Bible, where there are also passages of fiery hatred and others of glowing love. Why do some read their holy book in the first way and others in the second? The same applies to every other reading, starting with the most important one of all, our life: why do some interpret it as hatred and others, all things being equal, as a desire for peace?

 After observing human actions in their genesis and development with the strictest detachment, Spinoza comes to the conclusion that 'hatred can never be good' (Ethics IV, 45). I completely agree with him. Never means 'never', even when it comes to responding to hatred received. Especially when it is the state that is acting, as Spinoza specifies: 'Everything we appetite because we are affected by hatred is vile and unjust in the state'. The defining characteristic of a true politician is the ability to confront the enemy with determination but without hatred, because, as Spinoza always wrote, 'everyone who is guided by reason also desires for others the good that he appetites for himself' (Ethics, IV, 73). Do you desire land? Give land even to your enemy. Do you desire water? Give water to your enemy. And so for every other vital good. Behind these words of the greatest Jewish philosopher, I see the noble face of Yitzhak Rabin.

 

La Stampa


domenica 15 ottobre 2023

THERESE DE LISIEUX, LA GRACE DE LA CONFIANCE


L’exhortation apostolique consacrée à sainte Thérèse de Lisieux intitulée «C’est la confiance» est parue dimanche 15 octobre, à l’occasion du 150e anniversaire de la naissance de la sainte normande, mais aussi du centenaire de sa béatification. En 27 pages en français, le Pape ausculte le génie spirituel et théologique de Thérèse de l’Enfant-Jésus et de la Sainte Face.



-         par Delphine Allaire – Cité du Vatican

         

«Seule la confiance, et “rien d’autre”, il n’y a pas d’autre chemin pour nous conduire à l’Amour qui donne tout.» La date de cette publication, mémoire de sainte Thérèse d’Avila, a pour but de présenter sainte Thérèse de l’Enfant Jésus «comme un fruit mûr de la réforme du Carmel et de la spiritualité de la grande sainte espagnole», explique le Souverain pontife en préambule, touché par «la lumière et l’amour extraordinaires» rayonnant de la jeune religieuse morte à 24 ans, patronne des missions, patronne de la France. Lire l'intégralité de l'exhortation.

 L'évangélisation «par attraction»

Dès le premier chapitre, le Pape revient sur l’âme missionnaire de la carmélite entrée dans les ordres «pour sauver les âmes».[1] Les dernières pages de l’Histoire d’une âme[2] sont un testament missionnaire, affirme François, saluant sa manière de concevoir l’évangélisation «par attraction»,[3] «non par pression ou prosélytisme».

«Cette grâce libère de l’autoréférentialité», note le Saint-Père, sondant le cœur de Thérèse dans lequel «la grâce du baptême devient ce torrent impétueux qui se jette dans l’océan de l’amour du Christ, emportant avec lui une multitude de sœurs et de frères».

 La primauté de la grâce divine sur l'action humaine

Le Pape François revient sur «la petite voie» de la confiance et de l’amour, cœur de la spiritualité thérésienne. Thérèse raconte cette découverte de la petite voie dans l’Histoire d’une âme :[4] «Je puis donc, malgré ma petitesse, aspirer à la sainteté; me grandir, c’est impossible, je dois me supporter telle que je suis avec toutes mes imperfections; mais je veux chercher le moyen d’aller au Ciel par une petite voie bien droite, bien courte, une petite voie toute nouvelle».[5]

 «Face à une conception pélagienne de la sainteté,[6] individualiste et élitiste, plus ascétique que mystique, qui met surtout l’accent sur l’effort humain, Thérèse souligne toujours la primauté de l’action de Dieu, de sa grâce», observe le Souverain pontife, précisant que cette façon de penser ne contredit pas l’enseignement catholique traditionnel sur la croissance de la grâce. Mais Thérèse préfère souligner la primauté de l’action divine et enseigne au fond que, puisque nous ne pouvons avoir aucune certitude en nous regardant nous-mêmes,[7] nous ne pouvons pas non plus être certains de posséder des mérites.

 «L’attitude la plus appropriée est donc de mettre la confiance du cœur hors de soi-même, en la miséricorde infinie d’un Dieu qui aime sans limites et qui a tout donné sur la Croix de Jésus-Christ», souligne le Pape, estimant que telle confiance illimitée encourage ceux qui se sentent fragiles, limités, pécheurs «à se laisser conduire et transformer pour atteindre le sommet».

L’abandon quotidien

23. Le Successeur de Pierre invite à ne pas comprendre la confiance que Thérèse promeut «seulement par rapport à la sanctification et au salut personnels», mais dotée d’un sens intégral qui embrasse la totalité de l’existence concrète et s’applique à toute notre vie où nous sommes souvent envahis par les peurs, par le désir de sécurité humaine, par le besoin de tout contrôler. C’est là qu’apparaît l’invitation à un saint «abandon», qui libère «des calculs obsessionnels, de l’inquiétude constante pour l’avenir, des peurs qui enlèvent la paix».

 L’héroïsme du feu et de la foi dans la nuit

25. Thérèse a aussi vécu la foi la plus forte et la plus certaine «dans l’obscurité de la nuit et même dans l’obscurité du Calvaire». Son témoignage atteint son apogée dans la dernière période de sa vie, dans sa grande «épreuve contre la foi»,[8] commencée à Pâques 1896. Dans son récit [9], elle relie cette épreuve à la douloureuse réalité de l’athéisme en cette fin du XIXe siècle, «âge d’or» positiviste et matérialiste. Lorsqu’elle écrit que Jésus avait permis que son âme «fût envahie des plus épaisses ténèbres»,[10] elle désigne ces ténèbres de l’athéisme et le rejet de la foi chrétienne. «Thérèse perçoit, dans ces ténèbres, le désespoir, le vide du néant [11]», assure le Saint-Père, rappelant comment «l’experte en science de l’amour» a vaincu le mal. «Le récit de Thérèse montre le caractère héroïque de sa foi, sa victoire dans le combat spirituel face aux tentations les plus fortes. Elle se sent la sœur des athées et se met à table, comme Jésus, avec les pécheurs (cf. Mt 9, 10-13)».

 «Elle vit, même dans l’obscurité, la confiance totale de l’enfant qui s’abandonne sans crainte dans les bras de son père et de sa mère». Pour Thérèse, en effet, Dieu brille avant tout par sa miséricorde, clé pour comprendre tout ce qui est dit de Lui. Selon le Pape, c’est l’une des découvertes les plus importantes de Thérèse pour le peuple de Dieu. «Elle est entrée de manière extraordinaire dans les profondeurs de la miséricorde divine et y a puisé la lumière de son espérance sans limites».

 Espérance et charité

29. Le Souverain pontife rappelle à cet égard que le péché du monde est certes immense, mais il n’est pas infini comme l’est l’amour miséricordieux du Rédempteur. «Thérèse est témoin de la victoire définitive de Jésus sur toutes les forces du mal par sa passion, sa mort et sa résurrection. Mue par la confiance, elle ose écrire: ‘’Jésus, fais que je sauve beaucoup d’âmes, qu’aujourd’hui il n’y en ait pas une seule de damnée. Jésus, pardonne-moi si je dis des choses qu’il ne faut pas dire, je ne veux que te réjouir et te consoler’’.[12]»

31. L’Histoire d’une âme est aussi un témoignage de charité, relève le Successeur de Pierre. L’acte d’amour “Jésus, je t’aime”, continuellement vécu par Thérèse comme une respiration, est la clé de sa lecture de l’Évangile. Elle habite l’Évangile avec Marie et Joseph, Marie Madeleine et les Apôtres.

 La grâce dans la plus grande simplicité

36. Thérèse vit la charité dans la petitesse, dans les choses les plus simples de la vie quotidienne. «En effet, alors que les prédicateurs de son temps parlaient souvent de la grandeur de Marie de manière triomphaliste, éloignée de nous, Thérèse montre, à partir de l’Évangile, que Marie est la plus grande dans le Royaume des Cieux parce qu’elle est la plus petite (cf. Mt 18, 4), la plus proche de Jésus dans son humiliation», écrit encore le Saint-Père, ajoutant: «Elle voit que, si les récits apocryphes sont remplis de passages frappants et merveilleux, les Évangiles nous montrent une existence humble et pauvre, vécue dans la simplicité de la foi». Ainsi Marie a été la première à vivre la «petite voie» dans la foi pure et l’humilité, rappelle encore le Pape.

 Le corps et le cœur de l’Église

38. François développe ensuite l’amour de Thérèse pour l’Église, hérité de sainte Thérèse d’Avila: «Elle a pu atteindre les profondeurs de ce mystère». 39. Au chapitre 12 de la première Lettre de saint Paul aux Corinthiens, l’Apôtre utilise la métaphore du corps et de ses membres pour expliquer que l’Église comprend une grande variété de charismes ordonnés selon un ordre hiérarchique. Mais cette description ne suffit pas à Thérèse, note le Pape. Elle poursuit ses recherches, lit l’“hymne à la charité” du chapitre 13, y trouve sa réponse: «La Charité me donna la clef de ma vocation. Je compris que si l’Église avait un corps, composé de différents membres, le plus nécessaire, le plus noble de tous ne lui manquait pas, je compris que l’Église avait un Cœur, et que ce Cœur était brûlant d’amour. Je compris que l’Amour renfermait toutes les vocations, que l’Amour était tout, qu’il embrassait tous les temps et tous les lieux... en un mot, qu’il est éternel!»

 40. «Ce n’est pas le cœur d’une Église triomphaliste, c’est le cœur d’une Église aimante, humble et miséricordieuse», remarque le Saint-Père, jugeant qu’une telle découverte du cœur de l’Église est aussi une grande lumière pour nous aujourd’hui, «afin de ne pas nous scandaliser des limites et des faiblesses de l’institution ecclésiastique, marquée par des obscurités ou des péchés». «“Je serai l’amour” est le choix radical de Thérèse, sa synthèse définitive, son identité spirituelle personnelle», proclame François.

 À la fin, seul compte l’amour

45. C’est ainsi la confiance qui nous conduit à l’Amour, libère de la peur, aide à détourner le regard de nous-mêmes, écrit le Saint-Père. «Cela nous laisse un immense torrent d’amour et d’énergies disponibles pour rechercher le bien des frères. Et ainsi, au milieu de la souffrance de ses derniers jours, elle pouvait dire: «Je ne compte plus que sur l’amour».[13] À la fin, seul compte l’amour. La confiance fait jaillir les roses et les répand comme un débordement de la surabondance de l’amour divin.»

 Au chapitre 4, le Pape François aborde sainte Thérèse non seulement comme une mystique, mais comme une «Docteur de la synthèse» 47. L’exhortation permet au Pape de rappeler que, dans une Église missionnaire, «l’annonce se concentre sur l’essentiel, sur ce qui est plus beau, plus grand, plus attirant et en même temps plus nécessaire. La proposition se simplifie, sans perdre pour cela profondeur et vérité, et devient ainsi plus convaincante et plus lumineuse».[14] «Le cœur lumineux c’est la beauté de l’amour salvifique de Dieu manifesté en Jésus Christ mort et ressuscité».[15]

 Docteur synthétique géniale

48. Tout n’est pas central, car il y a un ordre ou une hiérarchie entre les vérités de l’Église, rappelle François -et «ceci vaut autant pour les dogmes de foi que pour l’ensemble des enseignements de l’Église, y compris l’enseignement moral»-,[16] mais le centre de la morale chrétienne est la charité, réitère le Pape. 49. Et François d’affirmer là que l’apport spécifique de la petite Thérèse comme sainte et comme docteur de l’Église n’est pas «analytique, comme pourrait l’être par exemple celui de saint Thomas d’Aquin». «Son apport est plutôt synthétique, car son génie est de nous conduire au centre, à l’essentiel, au plus indispensable», conclut le Souverain pontife.

 Audace et liberté intérieure

50. «Théologiens, moralistes, penseurs de la spiritualité, ainsi que les pasteurs et chaque croyant dans son milieu, nous devons encore recueillir cette intuition géniale de Thérèse et en tirer les conséquences tant théoriques que pratiques, tant doctrinales que pastorales, tant personnelles que communautaires. Il faut de l’audace et de la liberté intérieure pour y parvenir», exhorte le Pape. 52. Du ciel à la terre, l’actualité de sainte Thérèse de l’Enfant Jésus et de la Sainte Face demeure dans toute sa «petite grandeur», ajoute-t-il, concluant l’exhortation par cette litanie pour notre temps:

 «En un temps qui nous invite à nous enfermer dans nos intérêts particuliers, Thérèse nous montre qu’il est beau de faire de la vie un don. À un moment où les besoins les plus superficiels prévalent, elle est témoin du radicalisme évangélique. En un temps d’individualisme, elle nous fait découvrir la valeur de l’amour qui devient intercession. À un moment où l’être humain est obsédé par la grandeur et par de nouvelles formes de pouvoir, elle montre le chemin de la petitesse. En un temps où de nombreux êtres humains sont rejetés, elle nous enseigne la beauté d’être attentif, de prendre soin de l’autre. À un moment de complexité, elle peut nous aider à redécouvrir la simplicité, la primauté absolue de l’amour, la confiance et l’abandon, en dépassant une logique légaliste et moralisante qui remplit la vie chrétienne d’observances et de préceptes et fige la joie de l’Évangile. En un temps de replis et d’enfermements, Thérèse nous invite à une sortie missionnaire, conquis par l’attrait de Jésus Christ et de l’Évangile.»

 

[1] Ms A, 69v°, p. 187.

[2] Cf. Ms C, 33v°-37r°, pp. 280-285.

[3] Cf. Exhort. ap. Evangelii gaudium (24 novembre 2013), n. 14 : AAS 105 (2013), pp. 1025-1026.

[4] Cf. Ms C, 2v°-3r°, pp. 237-238.

[5] Ibid., 2v°, p. 237.

[6] Cf. Exhort. ap. Gaudete et Exsultate (19 mars 2018), nn. 47-62 : AAS 110 (2018), pp. 1124-1129.

[7] Le Concile de Trente l’expliquait ainsi : « Quiconque se considère lui-même, ainsi que sa propre faiblesse et ses mauvaises dispositions, peut être rempli d’effroi et de crainte au sujet de sa grâce » (Décret sur la justification, IX : DS, n. 1534). Le Catéchisme de l’Église Catholique le reprend lorsqu’il enseigne qu’il est impossible d’avoir une certitude sur nos propres sentiments ou sur nos œuvres (cf. n. 2005). La certitude de la confiance ne se trouve pas en nous-mêmes ; le propre moi ne fournit pas la base de cette certitude, qui ne repose pas sur une introspection. D’une certaine manière, saint Paul l’exprimait ainsi : « Je ne me juge même pas moi-même. Ma conscience ne me reproche rien, mais ce n’est pas pour cela que je suis juste : celui qui me soumet au jugement, c’est le Seigneur » (1 Co 4, 3-4). Saint Thomas d’Aquin l’expliquait ainsi : puisque « la grâce est de quelque manière imparfaite en ce sens qu’elle ne guérit pas totalement l’homme » (Summa I-II, q. 109, art. 9, ad 1), « il reste aussi une certaine obscurité d’ignorance dans l’intelligence » (ibid., co).

[8] Ms C, 31rº, p. 277.

[9] Cf. ibid., 5rº-7vº, pp. 240-244.

[10] Ibid., 5vº, p. 241.

[11] Cf. ibid., 6vº, pp. 242-243.

 

[12] Pri 2, p. 958.

[13] LT 242, à Sœur Marie de la Trinité (6 juin 1897), p. 599.

[14] Exhort. ap. Evangelii gaudium (24 novembre 2013), n. 35 : AAS 105 (2013), p. 1034.

[15] Ibid., n. 36 : AAS 105 (2013), p. 1035.

[16] Ibid.

 EXORTATION APOSTOLIQUE

[AR - DE - EN - ES - FR - IT - PL - PT]