Visualizzazione post con etichetta common good. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta common good. Mostra tutti i post

martedì 28 luglio 2026

TECHNOLOGY AND COMMON GOOD

 


 Technology must

 serve truth 

and the common good


es - fr - it



Pope Leo XIV encourages communicators at a seminar in Chile 

to promote communication that, 

in “the face of the new opportunities offered 

by technological development,

 knows how to safeguard the dignity of the human person."

By Giovanni Zavatta

Pope Leo XIV has encouraged communicators to ensure that every technological tool is placed "at the service of truth and the common good," as the Church reflects on the opportunities and challenges presented by artificial intelligence.

His message, signed by Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin, was sent to participants in the Seventh International Seminar on Church Communication, taking place on 27-28 July at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile in Santiago.

The seminar, entitled The Challenges of Artificial Intelligence, has brought together communicators, pastoral workers, academics and Church representatives from across Latin America and the Caribbean to reflect on the ethical, cultural and religious implications of artificial intelligence in light of Pope Leo XIV's Encyclical Magnifica humanitas.

Wisdom and responsibility in the age of AI

Addressing Archbishop René Osvaldo Rebolledo Salinas, President of the Chilean Bishops' Conference, the Pope expresses the hope that participants will promote "a communication that, in the face of the new opportunities offered by technological development, knows how to safeguard the dignity of the human person and place every tool at the service of truth and the common good."

Pope Leo also entrusts the seminar to the guidance of the Holy Spirit, praying that its participants may address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence "with wisdom and responsibility, so that ecclesial communication may foster encounter among people and contribute to the proclamation of the Gospel."

Social media as human spaces

Opening the seminar, Cardinal Fernando Natalio Chomalí Garib, Archbishop of Santiago de Chile, reflected on the impact of social media, describing them as "truly human" spaces because they reflect emotions, relationships and conflicts.

"Everything that happens to us also happens there," he said, proposing four essential criteria for communication: truth, goodness, beauty and usefulness.

The Cardinal highlighted that Magnifica humanitas, dedicated to safeguarding the human person in the age of artificial intelligence, should not be read solely from a technological perspective.

"Today there is much discussion about artificial intelligence," he noted, "but this Encyclical speaks above all about human dignity and truth."

Building Jerusalem, not Babel

Cardinal Chomalí said communication rooted in those principles can strengthen community life in an increasingly individualistic society.

"We will promote dialogue, we will promote fraternity; in the end, we will build Jerusalem, not Babel," he said.

The same themes were echoed in the homily he delivered during the Eucharistic celebration that followed. Describing Magnifica humanitas as a "Christological" Encyclical, he called for communication marked by discernment and expressed the hope that artificial intelligence would always remain at the service of human dignity.

A shared journey for the Church

Among the other speakers on the opening day were Juan Carlos de la Llera, Rector of the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, and Archbishop Rebolledo Salinas, who described the gathering as a concrete expression of synodality and of the Church's shared journey.

He said the publication of Magnifica humanitas has given renewed depth to the Church's pastoral reflection on emerging technologies.

"The inviolable dignity of the human person must constitute the principle, the criterion and the ultimate goal of both technological development and scientific progress," he said.

Vatican News

Image

mercoledì 1 aprile 2026

THE COMMON GOOD

 


Space and humanity

 at a crossroads:

 A new frontier

 of the common good

On the occasion of the launch of the NASA Artemis II mission on April 1, 2026, the Caritas in Veritate Foundation has released a video featuring reflections and perspectives on space exploration and the principles that should govern humanity’s relationship with it. Archbishop Ettore Balestrero, in an interview with Vatican media, affirms that “space must remain a common good, with clear legal norms and a sense of responsibility toward all humanity and future generations.”

By Fabio Colagrande and Eugenio Murrali

On April 1st the Artemis II mission is scheduled to launch from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida. It is the second mission of NASA’s Artemis lunar program and the first to carry astronauts. The mission includes a crew of four astronauts who will travel beyond Earth’s orbit to perform a wide flyby of the Moon, without landing. It represents an intermediate step toward Artemis III, the mission aimed at returning astronauts to walk on the lunar surface 53 years after Apollo 17, which concluded on December 14, 1972. Space has increasingly become a subject of discussion within the United Nations. The number of satellites in orbit has grown exponentially in recent years, highlighting how space has become a constant theme in debates related to geopolitics, security, and international relations.

To explore the significance of space missions, the Caritas in Veritate Foundation, chaired by Archbishop Ettore Balestrero, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations Institutions in Geneva, has produced and released a video, following last February’s publication: "Outer Space and Humanity at the Crossroads: A New Frontier of the Common Good." The video offers and synthesizes reflections on the purpose of exploring the universe, bringing into dialogue science, theology, and international law, as well as the principles that should govern humanity’s relationship with it and among human beings in the face of this work of God.

Your Excellency, why is reflection on political and regulatory choices for space so urgent?

The Mission of the Holy See in Geneva and the Caritas in Veritate Foundation, which works in collaboration with it, are concerned with space, which is God’s creation and obeys His laws. 

To reach Heaven, a supernatural concept, human beings must behave well also in space, which is instead a geographical concept, belonging to the physical and biological order. Space is not terra nullius; it is not a lawless field of conquest governed by the principle “first come, first served.” This is the origin of the publication’s title Space and Humanity at a Crossroads, and also of the content of the video we produced. Humanity is already making decisions about space, moral decisions that will have long-term impacts and can either build up or destroy humanity. For this reason, the Church cannot remain indifferent.

In what way?

Looking at space from an ethical perspective urges us to ask: “Is it right to pursue everything that we are technologically capable of achieving? How should we do it? What kind of reality and order do we want to build?” The ethical and multilateral perspective is precisely what the Foundation’s document and video propose.

What actions, in particular, are necessary?

Space must remain a common good, with clear legal norms that, where necessary, are updated with a sense of responsibility toward all humanity and future generations. When we presented the publication at the United Nations in Geneva, the testimony of an astronaut who had spent nearly a year aboard the International Space Station (Michael Scott Hopkins) made a strong impression on the audience. He described the so-called overview effect.

What does that consist of?

It is the change in perspective experienced by all astronauts in space: the Earth appears small, fragile, without borders or divisions, a symbol of shared belonging and collective responsibility. Sadly, this image contrasts with the reality of wars, abuses, and violence that emerge when we return to viewing the planet up close. Pope Benedict XVI recalled this in words that remain relevant today, during a dialogue with astronauts aboard the International Space Station: “ I think it must be obvious to you how we all live together on one Earth and how absurd it is that we fight and kill each other.”

So space too is a common home, with rules to be respected. What specific contribution can the Church’s social teaching offer in guiding space development toward the common good?

The Church’s central message is that we must not turn space into a jungle. It offers humanity a kind of second chance, inviting us to avoid many of the mistakes made on Earth. Space must be explored with responsibility, solidarity, and respect for subsidiarity, for the benefit of present and future generations.

How?

We must prevent it from becoming a theater of uncontrolled competition, or worse, conflict. The first practical step the Holy See urges is respect for the Outer Space Treaty, signed by about 120 states, including all major spacefaring nations. In force for nearly sixty years (since 1967), it clearly establishes that the exploration and use of space must be carried out for the benefit and in the interest of all countries. The treaty defines space as the “province of all humankind.” The Holy See calls for strengthening existing legislation, not abandoning it, to avoid leaving some countries behind and to preserve care for creation, for example, through joint projects to remove space debris.

Is there a risk of militarization in space as well?

Certainly. Existing international law prohibits placing nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction in orbit, on celestial bodies, or in space, Article 4 of the 1967 Treaty. However, it does not explicitly prohibit conventional weapons or, for example, cyberattacks, nor does it ban interference with radio signals, which is already happening, unfortunately.

It is important to distinguish between using space to support military operations on Earth, such as through satellites, which is already a reality and the physical deployment of weapons and their direct use in space.

Is the latter a concrete possibility?

Some states are moving toward deploying weapons in orbit, and this increases international instability, weakens mutual trust, and transforms space from a “province of humanity,” as defined by the Treaty, into yet another theater of conflict. It is essential to understand that if a conflict were to directly involve space, it would likely spare no one on Earth.

Here in Geneva, it is often said that a war in space could never be won and should never be fought. For example, it is difficult to see how the principle of distinction, one of the cornerstones of international humanitarian law, could be respected. Therefore, many voices, including that of the Holy See, call for strengthening rules, transparency, and multilateral cooperation to preserve the peaceful use of space.

How, instead, can space competition become a positive mechanism for the good of all? How can space serve human dignity on Earth?

Competition must be balanced with cooperation. Competition without cooperation leads to instability, irrational clashes, violence, and even conflict. When oriented toward peaceful goals and channeled into cooperative forms, competition stimulates research, but it must translate into shared goods, common standards, and international partnerships.

With what effects?

Balancing competition and cooperation helps prevent the commercial use of space from becoming an end in itself and worsening existing inequalities. A healthy balance enables space to directly serve human dignity and the common good, for example, in times of crisis, through emergency communications, satellite data for humanitarian assistance, or monitoring to protect places of worship. In other cases, it improves weather forecasting, agriculture, healthcare, and transport, and reaches countries and communities that would otherwise be excluded.

How can science and faith move forward together in space research?

Science and faith can walk together and strengthen one another: science seeks scientific truths, while faith seeks the supernatural Truth, the truth about God and from God, which illuminates the human path. They neither overlap nor contradict each other. Science explains the “how,” while faith illuminates and guides the ultimate “why” of human action. In the context of space, this means using technical and scientific expertise for the common good, ensuring that progress does not become domination or destruction.

What role can the Holy See play?

The Holy See can and must play a role in ongoing debates on space first and foremost at the intergovernmental level by enlightening consciences and addressing the whole world, including the commercial and industrial sectors. Internationally, through its missions in Geneva, New York, and Vienna, it proposes an ethical framework centered on human dignity and contributes to multilateral dialogue and peace, promoting a shared sense of responsibility with space understood as a common good.

Moreover, the Caritas in Veritate Foundation, in collaboration with the Mission in Geneva, organizes events in Geneva, Brussels, Vienna, and New York, and produces publications and videos such as those released in recent days. It should also be remembered that the Holy See operates one of the oldest astronomical observatories in existence—the Vatican Observatory, established in its current form by Pope Leo XIII in 1891, affirming that the Church does not oppose true, sound science, but rather encourages and promotes it with full commitment.

Vatican News

Immagine

 

sabato 27 settembre 2025

PHILIPPINES - COMMON GOOD

  

en- fr- 

 Politics and the Pursuit of 

the Common Good


Our class discussion on September 20, 2025 explored the current issues related to politics and governance. We reflected on the principles that should guide leadership and policy. Conversely, we also discussed the realities that often complicate these principles. In this paper, I would like to integrate insights from our recent discussions, Giovanni Perrone’s reflections on education and leadership, and our shared observations on the current political landscape especially in the Philippines.

For me, leadership should not be measured by speeches or promises, but by tangible results that benefit the people. Recent political issues in the Philippines forced us to ask: do actions really align with our national values and goals? This kind of alignment could narrow the painful gap between promises and results.

When we turned to political systems, our discussion on decentralization offered valuable insights. The examples of BARMM and CAR in the Philippines show that even with devolved powers, governance is still a constant balancing act with the national government. Both regions highlight the lesson that a nation should hold on to a shared identity while still allowing its regions to govern in ways that reflect their unique needs. Aside from local connections, the presence of international observers in Philippine politics shows how connected it is to global relationships and shared democratic values.

Moreover, our conversation on the “eminent disaster” bill is important. Giving the president the power to declare such a state is necessary in times of crisis, but it also carries risks of abuse. If misused to suppress dissent, it could undermine democracy itself. This raised an ethical question that connects back to St. Thomas’ idea of prudence that is the virtue of thinking carefully before acting, and ensuring decisions are rooted in truth and justice. For politics to truly serve the people, it must be anchored in this virtue.

In the end, our discussions left me with three strong convictions. First, leadership is not about holding power but about using it wisely with prudence and a clear focus on the common good. Second, governance must be honest, evidence-based, and grounded in data. Lastly, true leaders rise above personal or cultural loyalties to serve the broader community. The pursuit of the national common good is a lifelong journey.

Giovanni Perrone’s reflections on education and leadership as keys to good governance deeply resonate with these reflections. His emphasis on leadership as a service rooted in values, foresight, and responsibility aligns with the ethical standards a leader should carry. As a PhD student in Development Studies, I am reminded that education is not just the transmission of knowledge but a transformative journey. Perrone’s call to rediscover joy and the virtue of hope challenges me to approach governance as a technical and moral endeavor. Whether crafting policy or building theory, our task is to serve the common good with compassion and a deep sense of purpose.

 Learning Paper No. 6 - Sto Tomas University Manila - Philippines

Politique et recherche du bien commun

Notre discussion en classe du 20 septembre 2025 a exploré les enjeux actuels liés à la politique et à la gouvernance. Nous avons réfléchi aux principes qui devraient guider le leadership et les politiques. Inversement, nous avons également abordé les réalités qui complexifient souvent ces principes. Dans cet article, je souhaite intégrer les enseignements tirés de nos discussions récentes, les réflexions de Giovanni Perrone sur l'éducation et le leadership, ainsi que nos observations partagées sur le paysage politique actuel, notamment aux Philippines.

Pour moi, le leadership ne doit pas se mesurer à des discours ou des promesses, mais à des résultats tangibles qui profitent à la population. Les récents enjeux politiques aux Philippines nous ont amenés à nous demander : les actions sont-elles réellement en phase avec nos valeurs et nos objectifs nationaux ? Un tel alignement pourrait réduire l'écart douloureux entre promesses et résultats.

En ce qui concerne les systèmes politiques, notre discussion sur la décentralisation a apporté des éclairages précieux. Les exemples de la BARMM et de la CAR aux Philippines montrent que, même avec des pouvoirs décentralisés, la gouvernance reste un exercice d'équilibre permanent avec le gouvernement national. Les deux régions illustrent la leçon selon laquelle une nation doit préserver une identité commune tout en permettant à ses régions de gouverner selon des modalités qui reflètent leurs besoins spécifiques. Au-delà des liens locaux, la présence d'observateurs internationaux dans la politique philippine témoigne de son ancrage dans les relations internationales et les valeurs démocratiques communes.

Par ailleurs, notre discussion sur le projet de loi sur les « catastrophes imminentes » est importante. Donner au président le pouvoir de proclamer un tel État est nécessaire en temps de crise, mais comporte également des risques d'abus. Utilisé à mauvais escient pour réprimer la dissidence, il pourrait saper la démocratie elle-même. Cela a soulevé une question éthique qui renvoie à la notion de prudence de Saint Thomas, à savoir la vertu de réfléchir attentivement avant d'agir et de s'assurer que les décisions sont fondées sur la vérité et la justice. Pour que la politique serve véritablement le peuple, elle doit être ancrée dans cette vertu.

En fin de compte, nos discussions m'ont permis de dégager trois convictions fortes. Premièrement, le leadership ne consiste pas à détenir le pouvoir, mais à l'utiliser à bon escient, avec prudence et en se concentrant clairement sur le bien commun. Deuxièmement, la gouvernance doit être honnête, fondée sur des preuves et des données. Enfin, les véritables leaders transcendent les loyautés personnelles ou culturelles pour servir la communauté au sens large. La quête du bien commun national est un cheminement de toute une vie.

Les réflexions de Giovanni Perrone sur l'éducation et le leadership, clés d'une bonne gouvernance, résonnent profondément avec ces réflexions. Son insistance sur le leadership comme un service ancré dans les valeurs, la prévoyance et la responsabilité s'inscrit dans le droit fil des normes éthiques que tout leader devrait porter. En tant que doctorant en études du développement, je me rappelle que l'éducation n'est pas seulement la transmission de connaissances, mais un cheminement transformateur. L'appel de Perrone à redécouvrir la joie et la vertu de l'espoir m'incite à aborder la gouvernance comme une démarche technique et morale. Qu'il s'agisse d'élaborer des politiques ou de construire des théories, notre tâche est de servir le bien commun avec compassion et un profond sens du devoir.

Document d'apprentissage n° 6

 

giovedì 25 aprile 2024

TODAY'S DISEAIS IS APATY


Power, democracy  
 and the common good. 


"In democracies 

the exercise 

of power becomes

 service."

At the conference held on April 24, at the Pontifical Lateran University, promoted by the Cortile dei Gentili, the cardinal spoke about the relationship between religion and power in the light of the Scriptures. In the confrontation between believers and non-believers, the writer D'Arcais underlined the importance and effectiveness of a dialogue "without diplomatism". 

Monsignor Staglianò: democracy is service and affirmation of social trust, otherwise there is a risk of authoritarian drift

-         by Antonella Palermo - Vatican City

Render to Caesar what is Caesar's, to God what is God's. It is the biblical fulcrum referred to by Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, creator of the Courtyard of the Gentiles, who in the round table held today, 24 April, at the Pontifical Lateran University and moderated by Monsignor Antonio Staglianò, president of the Pontifical Academy of Theology, illustrates the relationship between religion and politics as offered by the Holy Scriptures.

Don't confuse secular with secularist

The cardinal, president emeritus of what was the Pontifical Council for Culture, highlights the difficulty of the current challenge of walking between a theocratic model, with its statist parallel, of power management and a model that takes into account the political teaching of Christ. On the one hand, the absolute verticalism which derives power from a superior entity or which confines the sacred to an intimate temple without social implications, on the other the assumption that human society is the true subject, in which there are some values foundations proposed by religion, since man and woman are the image of God (even women, the cardinal specifies, "we often forget"). The issue in constant play is, Ravasi warns, confusing secularist with secularist. And in this regard, he invites us not to forget that "Christ was a layman. Therefore his presence allows us to understand how he himself gave the impulse to overcome the theocratic model".

Politics and democracy in a liquid society

The theme is taken up again by President Giuliano Amato who, after a historical summary of the process of affirmation of democracy in the West, asks how to protect the common good in the face of the risk, inherent in the very concept of democracy, of the disintegration of power. The point is, essentially, "how to restore a common platform of cohesive factors". Because politics, for example if the function of parties is discredited, ends up being deprived of those elements that absorb tensions between individual interests. The party system projects politics towards future horizons, Amato maintains, which otherwise limits itself exclusively to re-acting, and not to acting, as it should, on impulses that crush it on the contingencies of the present. "When we lost the visions provided by the parties, societies shattered", he explains and underlines that the individualisation of the liquid society contributed to the phenomenon. “In this context, aggregation on the extremes becomes even more harmful and unproductive”, he underlines, citing among others the aspect of diverging positions on an issue such as abortion. “From the treatment of taxes to that of immigrants, it is not easy to find cohesion – he adds – but it is fundamental”.

What dialogue do we believe in?

Paolo Flores D'Arcais, director of the MicroMega magazine, expresses his dissent by insisting on the fact that democracy "relies only on itself " and that "in the discussion for the deliberation that leads to the norm, the topic of God cannot be inserted otherwise we are no longer dealing with citizens." The philosopher specifies that in a democratic regime only “established facts, the use of logic and constitutional values (those that make us co-citizens) count”. He also invites us to clear the language of ambiguity: "Which God are we referring to? What concept of democracy, given that even some despots speak of democracy?". The director says he believes in "dialogue without diplomacy", the only one in which all differences are highlighted, otherwise any common action will be weakened.

The "disease" of apathy and the risks of authoritarian tendencies

Replying to D'Arcais on some aspects concerning the end of life and self-determination is Monsignor Staglianò: "When I say I decide for myself, I must understand that that 'for me' is a social product", he states, while welding together solidarity and citizenship speaks Monsignor Patrick Valdrini , professor of the Lateran University, who points out that "the faithful have the right to be recognized as a freedom that belongs to all citizens and a culture acquired in the Church, without this separating them from the rest of society" . And if Cardinal Ravasi comments, in agreement with D'Arcais, denouncing a particular form of illness which defines apatheism, or indifference, even in the religious sphere, which has truly become an enemy of democracy, on the eve of 25 April, Liberation Day for Italy, Monsignor Staglianò, to Vatican News, specified that " within democracies the exercise of power becomes service ". When this is not the case, he underlines, it becomes authoritarianism.

And he returns to the value of the common good: it "cannot be the sum of the interests of individual groups, but must be social trust within a peaceful civil coexistence, where all citizens can show solidarity and love each other. A democratic society that would prevent human ability to express oneself would not be such."

Vatican News

 

 


sabato 31 ottobre 2020

COVID: THROUGH A COMMON EVIL WE REDISCOVER THE COMMON GOOD - - es - it

Pope Francis is certain of this and is repeating it to everyone: we will emerge either better or worse after the pandemic The global crisis requires that the parameters of human co-existence be rethought through the lens of solidarity. Based on this foundational idea, the "Covid-19: Building a Healthier Future" has been created in collaboration with the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, to offer a vision that might lead to the beginning of a new fraternity after the pandemic.

Healthcare, education, security – these are the linchpins of any nation which should not be subject to making a profit. Economist Luigino Bruni, one of the experts Pope Francis called to be part of the Vatican Covid-19 Commission, is convinced that the lesson of the pandemic will help us rediscover the profound truth connected with the expression "common good". This is so because, as he believes, everything is fundamentally a common good: politics in its true sense, the economy which looks to humanity before seeking to make a profit. In this new global vision that can be born after the pandemic, the Church, he states, must make itself a "guarantor" of this collective patrimony, in so far as it is lies outside the logic of commerce. Bruni's hope is that this experience, conditioned by a virus that has no boundaries, will help us not forget "the importance of human cooperation and global solidarity".

You are part of the Vatican COVID 19 Commission, Pope Francis’ response mechanism to an unprecedented virus. What do you personally hope to learn from this experience? In what way do you think society as a whole can be inspired by the work of the Commission?

R. – The most important thing I have learned from this experience is the importance of the principle of precaution for the common good. Absent for the most part in the initial phase of the epidemic, the principle of precaution, one of the pillars of the Church’s social doctrine, tells us something extremely important. The principle of precaution is lived obsessively on the individual level (it’s enough to think of the insurance companies which seem to be taking over the world), but is completely absent on the collective level, and thus makes 21st century society extremely vulnerable. This is why those countries which have preserved a bit of a welfare state have demonstrated themselves a lot stronger than those governed entirely by the market And then the common good: since a common evil has revealed to us what the common good is, so has the pandemic forced us to see that the common good requires community, and not only the market. Health, safety, and education cannot be left to the game of profit.

Pope Francis asked the COVID 19 Commission to prepare the future instead of prepare for it. What should be the role of the Catholic Church as an institution in this endeavor?

R. – The Catholic Church is one of the few (if not the only) institution that guarantees and safeguards the global common good. Having no private interests, it can pursue the good of all. It is because of this that she has a vast hearing. For the same reason, she has a responsibility to exercise it on a global scale.

What personal lessons (if any) have you derived from the experience of the pandemic? What concrete changes do you hope to see after this crisis both personally and globally?

R. – The first lesson is the value of relational goods. Not being able to exchange hugs in these months, I have rediscovered the value of an embrace and of contact. Secondly, we can and must have many online meetings and working remotely, but for important decisions and for decisive meetings, the internet does not suffice. Physical presence is necessary. So, the virtual boom is making us discover the importance of flesh and blood contact and the intelligence of the human body. I hope that we do not forget the lessons learned in these months (because people forget very quickly), in particular the importance of politics as we have rediscovered in these months (as the art of the common good against a common evil), and that we do not forget the importance of human cooperation and global solidarity.

Preparing for the post-Covid world includes forming future generations, who will be forced to make decisions that forge new paths. In this sense, can education be considered only as a “cost” to reduce, even in times of crisis?

R. – Education, above all that of children and young people, is much more than an “expense”… It is a collective investment with the highest rate of social return. I hope that in those countries where schools are still closed, a national holiday will be designated when they are reopened. Democracy begins at the school desk and there it is born again in each generation. The first heritage (patres munus) that we pass on through the generations is that of education.

Tens of millions of children around the world do not have access to education. Can article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights be ignored, which affirms that everyone has the right to free and mandatory education, at least regarding elementary education?

R. – Clearly this must not be ignored, but we cannot ask that the cost of education be entirely sustained by countries without sufficient resources. We must quickly give life to a new international cooperation under the slogan: “educating children and adolescents is a global common good”, where countries with more resources help those will fewer resources so that the right to free education becomes real. This pandemic has shown us that the world is a large community. We must transform this common evil into new common, global goods.

Educational budgets have undergone sometimes drastic cuts even in rich countries. Could there really be a desire not to invest in future generations?

R. – If economic logic takes over, reasoning such as this will increase: “Why should I do something for future generations? What have they done for me?” If do ut des ‘(I’ll give something only if I get something out of it), the commercial mantra, becomes the new logic of nations, we will always invest less in education, and we will always create more debt which today’s children will pay off. We must become generous once again and cultivate non-economic virtues such as compassion, meekness, and generosity.

Though it finds itself in economic difficulty, the Catholic Church is on the front lines offering education to the poorest. As we’ve seen during this pandemic, lockdowns have had a considerable impact on Catholic schools. But the Church continues to welcome everyone, without distinctions based on creed, making space for encounter and dialogue. How important is this aspect?

R. – The Church has always been an institution for the common good. Luke’s parable does not tells us about the faith of the half-dead man who the Good Samaritan assisted. It is precisely during the gravest crises that the Church rediscovers her vocation as Mater et magister (Mother and teacher), that the esteem of non-Christians grows toward her, that the sea that gathers everything in, then gives everything to everyone, above all to the poorest. The Church has always known, after all, that the indicator of every common good is the condition of the poorest.

What contribution can education about religion and religions offer young people, especially in a world increasingly driven by divisions and which fosters the engagement of fear and tension?

R. – That depends on how they are taught. The ethical dimension which exists in every religion is not enough. The main teaching that religions can offer today regards the interior life and spirituality, because our generation, in the space of just a few decades, has squandered a thousand-year-old heritage which contained ancient wisdom and popular piety. The world’s religions must help the young and everyone else to rewrite a new “grammar” of the interior life. If they do not do that, depression will become the plague of the 21st century.

 

Covid: Un mal común para redescubrir el bien común 

COVID, UN MALE COMUNE PER RISCOPRIRE IL BENE COMUNE



Vatican News

 

 

mercoledì 9 settembre 2020

HEALING THE WORLD: LOVE AND COMMON GOOD - Guérir le monde” - GUERIR LE MONDE: L'AMOUR ET LE BIEN COMMUN - CURAR EL MUNDO: AMOR Y BIEN COMUN


-   AR  - DE  - EN  - ES  - FR  - IT  - PL  - PT  -  

Pope Francis: "The crisis we are living due to the pandemic is affecting everyone; we will emerge from it for the better if we all seek the common good together; the contrary is we will emerge for the worse. Unfortunately, we see partisan interests emerging. For example, some would like to appropriate possible solutions for themselves, as in the case of vaccines, to then sell them to others. Some are taking advantage of the situation to instigate divisions: by seeking economic or political advantages, generating or exacerbating conflicts. Others simply are not interesting themselves in the suffering of others, they pass by and go their own way (see Lk 10:30-32. They are the devotees of Pontius Pilate, washing their hands of others’ suffering.

The Christian response to the pandemic and to the consequent socio-economic crisis is based on love, above all, love of God who always precedes us (see 1 Jn 4:19). He loves us first, He always precedes us in love and in solutions. He loves us unconditionally and when we welcome this divine love, then we can respond similarly. I love not only those who love me – my family, my friends, my group – but I also love those who do not love me, I also love those who do not know me or who are strangers, and even those who make me suffer or whom I consider enemies (see Mt 5:44). This is Christian wisdom, this is how Jesus acted. And the highest point of holiness, let’s put it that way, is to love one’s enemies which is not easy, it is not easy. Certainly, to love everyone, including enemies, is difficult – I would say it is even an art! But an art that can be learned and improved. True love that makes us fruitful and free is always expansive, and true love is not only expansive, it is inclusive. This love cares, heals and does good. How many times a caress does more good than many arguments, a caress, we can think, of pardon instead of many arguments to defend oneself. It is inclusive love that heals........

EN

La crise que nous vivons à cause de la pandémie frappe tout le monde; nous pouvons en sortir meilleurs si nous cherchons tous ensemble le bien commun; dans le cas contraire, nous en sortirons pires.  Malheureusement, nous assistons à l'apparition d'intérêts partisans. Par exemple, certains voudraient s'approprier de solutions possibles, comme dans le cas des vaccins et ensuite les vendre aux autres. D'autres profitent de la situation pour fomenter des divisions: pour chercher des avantages économiques ou politiques, en engendrant ou en accroissant les conflits. D'autres ne s'intéressent tout simplement pas à la souffrance d'autrui, passent outre  et poursuivent leur chemin (cf. Lc 10, 30-32). Ce sont les fidèles de Ponce Pilate, ils s'en lavent les mains.

La réponse chrétienne à la pandémie et aux conséquentes crises socio-économiques se base sur l’amour, tout d'abord l'amour de Dieu qui nous précède toujours (cf. 1 Jn 4, 19). Il nous aime le premier, Il nous précède toujours dans l'amour et dans les solutions. Il nous aime de manière inconditionnée, et quand nous accueillons cet amour divin, alors nous pouvons répondre de manière semblable. Je n'aime pas seulement ceux qui m'aiment: ma famille, mes amis, mon groupe, mais aussi ceux qui ne m'aiment pas, j'aime aussi ceux qui ne me connaissent pas, j'aime aussi ceux qui sont des étrangers, et aussi ceux qui me font souffrir ou que je considère comme des ennemis (cf. Mt 5, 44). C'est la sagesse chrétienne, c'est l'attitude de Jésus. Et le point le plus élevé de la sainteté, disons ainsi, est d'aimer ses ennemis, et ce n'est pas facile. Certes, aimer tout le monde, y compris ses ennemis, est difficile – je dirais que c'est un art! Mais un art qu'on peut apprendre et améliorer. L’amour vrai, qui nous rend féconds et libres, est toujours expansif et inclusif. Cet amour soigne, guérit et fait du bien. Bien souvent, une caresse fait plus de bien que beaucoup d'arguments, une caresse de pardon et pas tant d'arguments pour se défendre. C'est l'amour inclusif qui guérit. ....

 FR

La crisis que estamos viviendo a causa de la pandemia golpea a todos; podemos salir mejores si buscamos todos juntos el bien común; al contrario, saldremos peores. Lamentablemente, asistimos al surgimiento de intereses partidistas. Por ejemplo, hay quien quisiera apropiarse de posibles soluciones, como en el caso de las vacunas y después venderlas a los otros. Algunos aprovechan la situación para fomentar divisiones: para buscar ventajas económicas o políticas, generando o aumentando conflictos. Otros simplemente no se interesan por el sufrimiento de los demás, pasan por encima y van por su camino (cfr. Lc 10, 30-32). Son los devotos de Poncio Pilato, se lavan las manos.

La respuesta cristiana a la pandemia y a las consecuentes crisis socio-económicas se basa en el amor, ante todo el amor de Dios que siempre nos precede (cfr. 1 Jn 4, 19). Él nos ama primero, Él siempre nos precede en el amor y en las soluciones. Él nos ama incondicionalmente, y cuando acogemos este amor divino, entonces podemos responder de forma parecida. Amo no solo a quien me ama: mi familia, mis amigos, mi grupo, sino también a los que no me aman, amo también a los que no me conocen, amo también a lo que son extranjeros, y también a los que me hacen sufrir o que considero enemigos (cfr. Mt 5, 44). Esta es la sabiduría cristiana, esta es la actitud de Jesús. Y el punto más alto de la santidad, digamos así, es amar a los enemigos, y no es fácil. Cierto, amar a todos, incluidos los enemigos, es difícil —¡diría que es un arte!—. Pero es un arte que se puede aprender y mejorar. El amor verdadero, que nos hace fecundos y libres, es siempre expansivo e inclusivo. Este amor cura, sana y hace bien. Muchas veces hace más bien una caricia que muchos argumentos, una caricia de perdón y no tantos argumentos para defenderse. Es el amor inclusivo que sana......

ES

 AR  - DE  - EN  - ES  - FR  - IT  - PL  - PT ]