of Pope Francis:
because
peace is not a utopia”
- by Franco Vaccari
Do not be silent. Do not let it
remain only a theme for Sunday homilies.
It is too late to be prudent and too
early to be resigned...
The world's interest in who will be
Pope Francis' successor is, ultimately, a good sign.
The silent prayers of the cloistered
communities mix with the friendly bets in the bar, the curious murmuring of the
people of God, the good expectations of the people of Rome and beyond.
But alongside this authentic spirit,
there is also the chatter, the pressure, the coded messages intended for
"those who must understand", the lobbies and worldly interests.
And so, the heart of the pontificate
risks - but will not happen - being dismissed lightly, trivialized or reduced
to slogans. Especially with regard to the commitment to peace.
We hear people say: “Francis had a
weakness for peace” or: “What did you want him to say?
He simply acted like a Pope”.
Statements that seem harmless, but which in reality defuse the revolutionary
scope of a ministry.
No, the Pope did not have “a thing”
for peace.
The Pope – every Pope, and therefore
also Francis – embodies a word that comes from the Gospel, he does so as a man
and as the leader of a human-divine community.
This is not a personal opinion or a
pastoral idea that is a little too insistent: peace is the very heart of the
Gospel.
It is a living memory of the history
of the Church.
Pope Francis simply picked up a torch
that others before him kept alight.
Saint John XXIII wrote it in Pacem in
terris, addressing “all men of good will”. Saint Paul VI shouted at the UN:
“Never again war!”.
Saint John Paul II walked through the
rubble with the cross in his hand, and Benedict XVI recalled that there is no
peace without truth and justice, starting with the Church.
Francis removed the exclamation point
and put his feet in the mud: Ukraine, the Holy Land, Sudan, the Mediterranean.
And now he looks at us – yes, he
looks at us – and asks us only one thing: do not shelve peace.
Do not be silent. Do not let it
remain only a theme for Sunday homilies.
It is too late to be prudent and too
early to be resigned.
On the one hand, there are those who
dismiss this insistence as an ecclesial “obsession,” because “there is so much
else to do.”
On the other, those who nullify it by
saying, precisely: “Francis did nothing other than be Pope, he has no power, he
is not a head of state, easy!”.
Being Pope: in certain misleading
meanings it could seem like a job, so much so that even people with new CVs
considered suitable are applying.
Two narratives that normalize
prophecy and degrade it to utopia, while championing a “healthy realism” whose
failure is now evident.
We live in a world that deals with
peace only in function of war: when it is about to break out (to arm itself),
when it has broken out (as a sterile invocation), when it is over (to forget
it).
What would you do? And then he
cynically asks us: “And you, what would you do?”.
The answer is disarming: we would do
– or rather, we try to do – what that “obsession” of Pope Francis has repeated
every day, and before him, those “obsessions” of his predecessors.
Relegating the words and gestures of
the Popes on peace to a spiritual level, as a gentle truism, empties the
disruptive force of the Gospel, reducing it to a civil religion. But the Gospel
is something else: it is the soul of the human, in every aspect – civil,
economic, political – and asks each person to account for being incarnated with
coherence in their actions.
And this Gospel, precisely because it
is alive, subverts.
Both inside and outside the Church.
Jesus himself broke the patterns of “inside” and “outside”, eating with
sinners, speaking with the Samaritans, healing on the Sabbath, recognizing
“unauthorized” miracles.
But, despite everything, he did not
give up on the apostles: he wanted them with him, as long as their power was
service, not domination.
Messianic peace begins there: from
the way in which relationships are lived within the Church, and then spread
throughout the world.
And he questions everyone – from the
youngest to the top of the institutions – with the simplest and most radical
question: who are you on?
With Herod, with Pilate, with
Barabbas? Or with Christ?
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento